Hi,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 05:36:09PM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2011-12-05T22:37:03, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>
> > Did you clone the sbd resource? If yes, don't do that. Start it as a
> > primitive, so in case of a split brain at least one node needs to start
> > the stonith resource wh
On 2011-12-05T22:37:03, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> Did you clone the sbd resource? If yes, don't do that. Start it as a
> primitive, so in case of a split brain at least one node needs to start
> the stonith resource which should give the other node an advantage ...
> adding a start-delay should furth
On 12/05/2011 12:21 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 23:47 +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 12/04/2011 09:29 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
>>> This cluster reboots(fenced) both nodes, if I disconnects network of any
>>> nodes(simulating network failure).
>>
>>
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 23:47 +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/04/2011 09:29 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
> > This cluster reboots(fenced) both nodes, if I disconnects network of any
> > nodes(simulating network failure).
>
> Completely loss of network is indistinguishable for a clu
Hello,
On 12/04/2011 09:29 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
> This cluster reboots(fenced) both nodes, if I disconnects network of any
> nodes(simulating network failure).
Completely loss of network is indistinguishable for a cluster node to a
dead peer.
>
> I want that if any node disconnects fr
This cluster reboots(fenced) both nodes, if I disconnects network of any
nodes(simulating network failure).
I want that if any node disconnects from network, resources running on
that node should be moved/migrate
to the other node(network connected node)
How can I prevent this cluster to reboot(
