Re: [Linux-HA] fail count was initialized after recovering fromSplitBrain

2007-09-13 Thread Yan Fitterer
>> there is no 'cib' process. > > actually there is :-) Oops - Thanks for the correction Andrew! > >> If I understand things right, the crmd >> process handles all core CIB maintenance operations. > > nope, all done by the CIB process Makes sense __

Re: [Linux-HA] fail count was initialized after recovering fromSplitBrain

2007-09-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 9/13/07, Yan Fitterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Junko IKEDA wrote: > >>> once again something about SplitBrain... > >>> During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes. > >>> fail count was increased at this time. > >>> But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned

Re: [Linux-HA] fail count was initialized after recovering fromSplitBrain

2007-09-13 Thread Yan Fitterer
Junko IKEDA wrote: once again something about SplitBrain... During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes. fail count was increased at this time. But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned to zero on both! Is this due to the restart of crmd or pengine/tengine? Mo

Re: [Linux-HA] fail count was initialized after recovering fromSplitBrain

2007-09-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 9/13/07, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > once again something about SplitBrain... > > > During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes. > > > fail count was increased at this time. > > > But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned to zero on > both! > > >

RE: [Linux-HA] fail count was initialized after recovering fromSplitBrain

2007-09-13 Thread Junko IKEDA
> > once again something about SplitBrain... > > During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes. > > fail count was increased at this time. > > But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned to zero on both! > > Is this due to the restart of crmd or pengine/tengine? > > Mos