On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Qwerty-1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, i have already gone through this doc. this doc covers that using
> Pacemaker it is possible to define N+1 Architecture. It does not cover how
> to implement it. Please share any configuration information or any other doc
> that d
Hi,
Thanks, i have already gone through this doc. this doc covers that using
Pacemaker it is possible to define N+1 Architecture. It does not cover how
to implement it. Please share any configuration information or any other doc
that defines how to implement N+1 Architecture where one node will t
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Qwerty-1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. can all the nodes send status to a single node. i am working on HA
> N+1 architecture where LoadBalancer will look for the status of all running
> N nodes.If any node fails then LoadBalancer should know it and take
> appropriate s
Hi,
Thanks. can all the nodes send status to a single node. i am working on HA
N+1 architecture where LoadBalancer will look for the status of all running
N nodes.If any node fails then LoadBalancer should know it and take
appropriate steps.
Please suggest.
Thanks in Advance.
Andrew Beekhof-3
every node monitors itself
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Umakant Goyal wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to know that in HA is it possible that one node is monotoring all the
> other nodes?
>
> Thanks in Advance
> ___
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lis
Hi All,
I need to know that in HA is it possible that one node is monotoring all the
other nodes?
Thanks in Advance
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/R
