Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-17 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2008/3/17, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello: > > I have just upgraded from heartbeat1 to heartbeat2 on a set of SuSE > Enterprise Linux Servers but have found that if I insert a monitor operation > on some of the services I want monitored, it doesn't work. > > The services that heart

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-17 Thread Andreas Kurz
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:14 PM, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > I have just upgraded from heartbeat1 to heartbeat2 on a set of SuSE > Enterprise Linux Servers but have found that if I insert a monitor operation > on some of the services I want monitored, it doesn't work.

RE: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread David Thompson
: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring 2008/3/17, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello: > > I have just upgraded from heartbeat1 to heartbeat2 on a set of SuSE > Enterprise Linux Servers but have found that if I insert a monitor operation > on some of the serv

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 15:16 schrieb David Thompson: > Hello Ciro: > > Thanks so much. Adding a Status command did the trick. > > Could I please ask you one more question on this? I still am not able to > monitor the ldirectord service launched by Heartbeat. Since this is > launched by heart

RE: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread David Thompson
: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 15:16 schrieb David Thompson: > Hello Ciro: > > Thanks so much. Adding a Status command did the trick. > > Could I please ask you one more question on this? I still am not able > to monitor the ldirectord s

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 16:15 schrieb David Thompson: > I am using the ocf resource. Would it be more robust to use the lsb > resource which would use status to monitor? > > D No. Use OCF wherever possible. In my RA there is a "monitor" implemented. Which version on heartbeat do you use? --

RE: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread David Thompson
It is version 2.0.8 - installed just from SuSE Enterprise 10 RPMs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schwartzkopff Sent: 18 March 2008 15:20 To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring Am

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 16:34 schrieb David Thompson: > It is version 2.0.8 - installed just from SuSE Enterprise 10 RPMs. Get at least 2.1.3. If you you cannot install heartbeat in the new version get the OC RA from that package, or even better from the SuSE Build server. and copy it to your

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2008/3/18, Michael Schwartzkopff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 16:34 schrieb David Thompson: > > > It is version 2.0.8 - installed just from SuSE Enterprise 10 RPMs. > > > Get at least 2.1.3. If you you cannot install heartbeat in the new version get > the OC RA from that packa

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Service Monitoring

2008-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mar 18, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 16:34 schrieb David Thompson: It is version 2.0.8 - installed just from SuSE Enterprise 10 RPMs. Get at least 2.1.3. Or, if you're concerned about support, wait for SP2 which will also include 2.1.3 I