Re: [Linux-ha-dev] UUID bug?

fix is in CVS now. Let me know if that works or not thanks -Guochun Guochun Shi wrote: David Lee wrote: Heartbeat is failing. I'm chasing a really weird problem (CVS/HEAD), and the finger of suspicion is pointing at the way we handle UUIDs. I suspect that in at least one context we are p

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] UUID bug?

David Lee wrote: Heartbeat is failing. I'm chasing a really weird problem (CVS/HEAD), and the finger of suspicion is pointing at the way we handle UUIDs. I suspect that in at least one context we are passing the address of the UUID rather than the UUID itself. Top-down: 1. On Solaris-8,

[Linux-ha-dev] UUID bug?

Heartbeat is failing. I'm chasing a really weird problem (CVS/HEAD), and the finger of suspicion is pointing at the way we handle UUIDs. I suspect that in at least one context we are passing the address of the UUID rather than the UUID itself. Top-down: 1. On Solaris-8, I was getting error

[Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Bug 957] It is a mistake for the CRM to rely on the exact return code $OCF_NOT_RUNNING versus other forms of failure

On 2005-11-14T22:20:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm pulling this discussion over to the list, because I personally find bugzilla really unsuited for a design discussion ;-) Alan, let me preface this with: Yes, I agree it would be great if we could do away with it. If we find a way of doing so, I