On 2006-01-19T23:46:34, "Joachim Banzhaf (compuserve)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Joachim,
I decided fixing it would probably let me sleep better.
You can retry with the latest CVS HEAD, I think it should work better
now, I think it should solve this issue for you. Actually you only need
to
On 2006-01-19T23:46:34, "Joachim Banzhaf (compuserve)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > in my test (current cvs, 3 nodes) the heartbeat Filesystem RA monitor
> > > (not ocf) returns 0 (and prints "Running OK"). The filesystem actually
BTW, most heartbeat resource script calls now get mapped to O
Hi Lars,
Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2006 21:35 schrieb Lars Marowsky-Bree:
> On 2006-01-19T19:05:46, Joachim Banzhaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > in my test (current cvs, 3 nodes) the heartbeat Filesystem RA monitor
> > (not ocf) returns 0 (and prints "Running OK"). The filesystem actually
> > j
On Jan 19, 2006, at 11:22 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:23 PM, David Lee wrote:
Thanks, Andrew. Your work is appreciated!
No probs, I'm actually hoping this may have helped some intra-program
IPC weirdness I've been seeing on OSX..
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:23 PM, David Lee wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Andrew. Your work is appreciated!
>
> No probs, I'm actually hoping this may have helped some intra-program
> IPC weirdness I've been seeing on OSX...
Actually, Andrew, I hope my work has n
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Soffen, Matthew wrote:
> You don't want to do that. The file hb_api.py will be in some CVS
> tags.
>
> What will need to be done ( I think ) is "delete" the .py, Then add
> the .py.in file and make the change to configure.in
Phew!
Matt: Your observation that I "don't want t
You don't want to do that. The file hb_api.py will be in some CVS tags.
What will need to be done ( I think ) is "delete" the .py, Then add the .py.in file and make the change to configure.in
Matt
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 21:27 +, David Lee wrote:
While "grep"ping for somet
While "grep"ping for something across the heartbeat source code, I spotted
something completely unrelated that needs attention:
"heartbeat/hb_api.py" contains an absolute pathname in the line (~258):
FIFO_BASE_DIR = "/var/lib/heartbeat/"
My guess is that the pathname needs to be replaced by an
On 2006-01-19T20:17:58, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem I observe only manifested after the resources have been
> online for about 24h with one or two resource groups with some
> resources defined in it. So I'm not sure that the tests you run
> really are "real live" so to sa
On 2006-01-19T19:05:46, Joachim Banzhaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in my test (current cvs, 3 nodes) the heartbeat Filesystem RA monitor (not
> ocf) returns 0 (and prints "Running OK"). The filesystem actually just got
> successfully mounted by the start operation, so this behaviour is correct
Hello,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
>> - #1037: lrmd reports TIMEOUT althogh RA was never called
>>
>> This looks fairly obscure. I've asked for a clarification with CVS
>> HEAD,
>> because we've seen so many changes it's hard to say whether
On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-19T10:12:28, Nate Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious how the CTS is being used today. I heard it's mainly a
tool for Linux-HA developers. Is it currently used for automated
testing? Are there any users who are
Hi list,
in my test (current cvs, 3 nodes) the heartbeat Filesystem RA monitor (not
ocf) returns 0 (and prints "Running OK"). The filesystem actually just got
successfully mounted by the start operation, so this behaviour is correct for
the status operation.
Heartbeat messages indicate, that th
On 2006-01-19T10:12:28, Nate Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious how the CTS is being used today. I heard it's mainly a
> tool for Linux-HA developers. Is it currently used for automated
> testing? Are there any users who are using it to test their
> clusters?
>
> I have no
On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to inquire where we are at with 2.0.3 proper.
CVS is pretty different from 2.0.2:
741 files changed, 69764 insertions(+), 25884 deletions(-)
I've searched bugzilla and we only have 3 blockers reported against <=
2.0.3
On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:23 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
BSC passes fine - I have no objections.
BSC (presumably BasicSanityCheck): what platform? (Your earlier
email was
about OSX).
Yeah, OSX. I'll be running it on sles9 (x86) shortly.
Heartbeat 2.x
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> BSC passes fine - I have no objections.
BSC (presumably BasicSanityCheck): what platform? (Your earlier email was
about OSX).
Heartbeat 2.x (at least with IPaddr) has worked for some time on Solaris.
But BSC on Solaris has never passed. Even with th
Hi list,
somehow I managed to put this message in an other thread, so I try again...
during my usual hb build from current cvs I got the error that libgcrypt.la
could not be found.
Immediatelly before that, I installed python-devel, pam-devel, e2fsutils-devel
and gnutls-devel to be able to bui
BSC passes fine - I have no objections.
We should probably make sure this is in before 2.0.3
On 1/19/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> testing on OSX...
>
> On 1/19/06, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At long, long last, I think I've got "cl_status" working on Solaris. It
>
Hi,
I'm curious how the CTS is being used today. I heard it's mainly a tool for
Linux-HA developers. Is it currently used for automated testing? Are there
any users who are using it to test their clusters?
I have not had much luck with it yet. I am interested in helping get it ready
for g
Hi list,
during my usual hb build from current cvs I got the error that libgcrypt.la
could not be found.
Immediatelly before that, I installed python-devel, pam-devel, e2fsutils-devel
and gnutls-devel to be able to build the GUI and get rid of a uuid warning.
I guess that my suse 9.3 distro mi
testing on OSX...
On 1/19/06, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At long, long last, I think I've got "cl_status" working on Solaris. It
> had never worked in the past (anyone else ever had any luck?)
>
> I propose applying the attached patch in the next day or so, but it would
> be good if f
Until now, "ipctest" seems only to have been able to test the "pair" parts
of "ipcsocket.c", not the parts that handle connections amongst unrelated
processes.
Attached is a patch to "ipctest.c" to exercise those parts. By invoking
it with the additional argument "-c ", it sets up a server and
c
At long, long last, I think I've got "cl_status" working on Solaris. It
had never worked in the past (anyone else ever had any luck?)
I propose applying the attached patch in the next day or so, but it would
be good if folk could sanity check it, primarily to ensure I haven't
broken any existing
Hi all,
I'd like to inquire where we are at with 2.0.3 proper.
CVS is pretty different from 2.0.2:
741 files changed, 69764 insertions(+), 25884 deletions(-)
I've searched bugzilla and we only have 3 blockers reported against <=
2.0.3:
- #858: Subagent exited after an error.
This one does
On 2006-01-19T11:41:11, James Pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> A friend of mine are using heartbeat with apache in her lab. She has
> ever tried
> heartbeat 2.0.2 because of the resource monitor facility. But finally
> she gave up and
> switched back to heartbeat 1.2.
Well, 2.0.2 is pret
26 matches
Mail list logo
