On 2006-01-21T18:47:48, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
If you cast your mind back, the original purpose for managed/
unmanaged was so that we could depend on things that were outside the
CRM's control. So that resources could sit on top of an unmanaged
resource
On Jan 23, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-21T18:47:48, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
If you cast your mind back, the original purpose for managed/
unmanaged was so that we could depend on things that were outside the
CRM's control. So that
Hi,
Just getting caught up on the HA list...
Alan Robertson wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2005-11-11T16:23:04, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is something which the CGL people had asked for in the past - so
we included it. It was on our schedule for 2005. Perhaps
On Jan 23, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
Hi,
We've been experimenting with heartbeat 2.0.x after using hb 1.x for
some time. Until now we generated /etc/ha.d/ha.cf
and /etc/ha.d/haresources files based on some settings configured on a
GUI interface. This worked nicely.
With
