On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:27:35PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Alan Robertson wrote:
> The Linux-HA team proudly announces bug-fix release 2.0.5 of the
> Linux-HA (aka "heartbeat") software.
>
> As usual, you can find it here:
> http://linux-ha.org/download/index.html#2.0.5
I am happy to
On May 8, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: Andrew, What parts should fail ?well is has two "nodes" sections despite maxOccurs="1" :-) Matt On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: so as far as i can tell, the attached files _should_ fail. but they dont :-(
Andrew,
What parts should fail ?
Matt
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
so as far as i can tell, the attached files _should_ fail.
but they dont :-(
any thoughts?
On May 8, 2006, at 6:19 PM, A
On May 8, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: Andrew, Mine starts:http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"> Not sure of the elementFormDefault is needed but (It cant hurt). I also don't think you can do the typing like you did. Could you try this ( Lose the ext
Andrew,
Mine starts:
Not sure of the elementFormDefault is needed but (It cant hurt).
I also don't think you can do the typing like you did.
Could you try this ( Lose the extra typing ). I don't think you can define the top level elements in terms of types. OK ?
On May 8, 2006, at 4:53 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: The other nice feature of XSD is that it is written in XML as well. You can cleanly create new types within your XSD (I have one called YNType just to ensure a field is Y or N. If you need another pair of eyes to look at it when you are done.
The other nice feature of XSD is that it is written in XML as well.
You can cleanly create new types within your XSD (I have one called YNType just to ensure a field is Y or N.
If you need another pair of eyes to look at it when you are done. Let me know.
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 16:50 +020
On May 8, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: OK. My Bad. Yes. It does work to validate properly ( Had a typo in my xsd ). > xmllint --schema LRPMeteringData.xsd event_summary_20050629025529.xml http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="LRPMeteringData.xsd"
OK. My Bad. Yes. It does work to validate properly ( Had a typo in my xsd ).
> xmllint --schema LRPMeteringData.xsd event_summary_20050629025529.xml
event_summary_20050629025529.xml validates
So XSD could be an option.
Matt
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 15:52 +0200, Andrew Beekhof w
Andrew,
Actually it does support xsd (--schema SCHEMA_FILE.xsd) .
I'm curious to find out why my full XSD file isn't validating though ( it passes other tools ).
Matt
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 15:52 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
do you know what can we use to validate xml against it?
do you know what can we use to validate xml against it?i dont see xsd in xmllintOn May 8, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: Correction: My Bad. I meant XSD ( XML Schema Definition). This is an example of one I wrote for something at ISO. It allows you to define how many of a field may ex
Correction:
My Bad. I meant XSD ( XML Schema Definition). This is an example of one I wrote for something at ISO. It allows you to define how many of a field may exist, if it is required or not. Its pretty flexible ( at least I think).
Matt
On 5/8/06, Matthew Soffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has using an XSL been considered instead of a DTD ?
Matt
my understanding is that XSL will let you transform XML from one
"format" to another.
but that doesn't do validation as far as i can tell.
btw. were the extra changes to bootstrap o
Has using an XSL been considered instead of a DTD ?
Matt
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 15:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On May 8, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2006-05-08T14:16:15, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Good point.
>> we also need to find a way to hav
On May 8, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-08T14:16:15, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point.
we also need to find a way to have it ignore the order things appear
in... thats going to be a major PITA
You mean within the CIB? Well, the order is defined,
On 2006-05-08T14:16:15, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Good point.
> we also need to find a way to have it ignore the order things appear
> in... thats going to be a major PITA
You mean within the CIB? Well, the order is defined, doesn't matter too
much, or does it?
--
High Av
On May 8, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-08T13:26:17, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At least the aliases ought to be supported, or the comparison made
case
insensitive...
you obviously didnt see the rather large s/strcmp/strcasecmp/ commit
earlier today ;-
On 2006-05-08T13:26:17, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >At least the aliases ought to be supported, or the comparison made
> >case
> >insensitive...
> you obviously didnt see the rather large s/strcmp/strcasecmp/ commit
> earlier today ;-)
Ah, that came after the mail I replied t
On May 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-08T09:39:55, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zhenh, for the GUI to take advantage of this it needs three options:
Stop : target_role = Stopped
Start : target_role = Started
Automatic : target_role = default (or delete
On 2006-05-08T09:39:55, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zhenh, for the GUI to take advantage of this it needs three options:
>
> Stop : target_role = Stopped
> Start : target_role = Started
> Automatic : target_role = default (or delete the target_role nvpair
> completely which I beli
On 5/8/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : andrew
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : crm
Dir : linux-ha/crm/pengine
Modified Files:
complex.c
Log Message:
If target_role is set to anything other than "default", then any previous
val
21 matches
Mail list logo
