Martin Gazak wrote:
Hello,
I am running heartbeat 2.0.0 on SuSE10 (rpm -q heartbeat =
heartbeat-2.0.0.20050906-2).
I am launching heartbeat from my application in order to perform IP
failover between 2 nodes and the application communicates with the
heartbeat process through HEARTBEAT API in
This one time, at band camp, Horms said:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Let's see what the FHS says:
> > "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4]
> >
> > Now, what does heartbeat do?
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.4-
Hello,
I am running heartbeat 2.0.0 on SuSE10 (rpm -q heartbeat =
heartbeat-2.0.0.20050906-2).
I am launching heartbeat from my application in order to perform IP
failover between 2 nodes and the application communicates with the
heartbeat process through HEARTBEAT API in order to obtain info
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:32:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really
> needs those files there.
Any chances to use symlink ?
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`-
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
No, it is unclear because a resource _container_ is treated as if it was
merely an option on a primitive. Which it is not.
I added the label like "belong to" to show the "contain" relationship.
Or you may have better suggestion?
I also added the support to adding
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-14T16:09:54, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's one of those which can appear to work as long as nothing goes wrong
and then whacks you on the head while you're drinking your coffee...
I tend to agree, generally. But, apparently there are a numb
On 2006-06-14T16:09:54, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It's one of those which can appear to work as long as nothing goes wrong
> >and then whacks you on the head while you're drinking your coffee...
>
> I tend to agree, generally. But, apparently there are a number of
> people do
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-14T10:29:55, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For OCFS2, the fs code has been changed to accept membership events from
user-space, and you'll see that this is what the Filesystem RA does for
it.
OR, if it doesn't want to listen to you for membership
On 2006-06-14T10:29:55, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >For OCFS2, the fs code has been changed to accept membership events from
> >user-space, and you'll see that this is what the Filesystem RA does for
> >it.
> OR, if it doesn't want to listen to you for membership, you can't do
>
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-14T12:23:54, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And no, OCFS2 isn't the only CFS around, but typically, these require
special integration with the cluster stack / RA. This has so far only
been implemented for OCFS2. It wouldn't work for GFS w/o sig
On 2006-06-14T12:23:54, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And no, OCFS2 isn't the only CFS around, but typically, these require
> > special integration with the cluster stack / RA. This has so far only
> > been implemented for OCFS2. It wouldn't work for GFS w/o significant
> > chan
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:21:50PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2006-06-13T15:10:02, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a thing in the 2.0.6 Filesystem preventing NFS mounts in
> > case the mount is configured as a clone:
> >
> > if [ "$FSTYPE" = "ocf
On 2006-06-14T15:39:26, Huang Zhen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that there is no big difference between two screens and one splited
> screen.
That's what I said.
> Current confusing is caused by the unclear labels like "Advance ID".
No, it is unclear because a resource _container_ is t
Huang Zhen wrote:
I think that there is no big difference between two screens and one
splited screen.
Current confusing is caused by the unclear labels like "Advance ID".
I have improved it and I attached the screen shot here.
Any comment is welcome!
I also added the support to adding more than
14 matches
Mail list logo
