Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2006-11-03T16:53:15, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2.0.8: is that http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-dev/?
>
> No.
>
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/
>
> The server you pulled from has Andrew's working repos. The error you
> have is present in upstream
Zhen Huang wrote:
> I think it's a good idea to unify the commit comments. I would like to
> follow them.
>
> BTW, sorry for the unclear comment "GUI: Fix OSDL 1415: use
> xxx-xxx-xxx to replace xxx_xxx_xxx"
> (http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev?cmd=changeset;node=64516dbe675b).
> It should be "use new at
I think it's a good idea to unify the commit comments. I would like to
follow them.
BTW, sorry for the unclear comment "GUI: Fix OSDL 1415: use
xxx-xxx-xxx to replace xxx_xxx_xxx"
(http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev?cmd=changeset;node=64516dbe675b).
It should be "use new attribute name like xxx-xxx (like
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 12:12:02PM -0800, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
> On my v1-style configuration:
>
> In:
> /etc/ha.d/ha.cf
> -
> stonith wti_nps /etc/ha.d/conf/stonith.wti_nps
> apiauth stonithd uid=root
> -
> Note: I'm pretty sure the 2nd line is not needed, but it won't break your
I'd like to suggest what I think is a simple but useful policy for
dealing with commits to Mercurial which correspond to bug reports.
1) Most or all commits should have associated bugzillas. If you don't
have a bugzilla for at least 90% of your commits, you should make
more bugzillas. 1
