Hi,
We have found a several problems with pgsql RA through our testing.
It 'fails to failover' in some scenarios.
I'm proposing a patch to fix them.
Problem description:
1) The first 'monitor' may fail even if the postmaster was
successfully launched.
This is because 'start' of the pgsql
On 2007-02-23T19:07:19, Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for your enhancements!
They all look good. Merged.
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page:
On 2/23/07, Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We have found a several problems with pgsql RA through our testing.
It 'fails to failover' in some scenarios.
I'm proposing a patch to fix them.
Problem description:
1) The first 'monitor' may fail even if the postmaster was
I like the idea of the patch, but honestly I don't like how it's
implemented. It shall call (as Andrew suggested) monitor function to
check that pgsql is up or down instead of spreading the same code all
around the script. I'd like to review the idea and prepare another
patch if everybody is
And I don't like the idea of removing PID in start function. The
standard approach if to remove it after stopping application. Other
way it could lead to attempt of starting a second copy of application.
On 2/23/07, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea of the patch, but
Attached is the patch in the way that I like it to be.
On 2/23/07, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I don't like the idea of removing PID in start function. The
standard approach if to remove it after stopping application. Other
way it could lead to attempt of starting a second copy
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-02-22T20:30:10, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, that'd effectively mean needing to lock everything into
memory, which is clearly infeasible and there's more work here to fix
the theoretical deadlock issue.
But, with the same argument,
Sorry, I just found that my version won't work properly on Solaris.
Attached is the corrected one. Sorry for creating so many messages
:-)
On 2/23/07, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is the patch in the way that I like it to be.
On 2/23/07, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/23/07, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/23/07, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/23/07, Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We have found a several problems with pgsql RA through our testing.
It 'fails to failover' in some scenarios.
I'm proposing a
