On 2007-06-28T11:25:22, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and that doesn't address the other issue of using autoconf to find the
> full path to binaries like fsck.
A big desire I have is that I want to be able to copy the RAs directly
from my source tree to the target system.
Thus, all
On 2007-06-27T20:17:01, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to the openSUSE build service, I'm pleased to announce that we
> now finally have daily builds, directly pulled from
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev available at
>
> http://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=heartbea
On 6/28/07, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> [...]
> A bunch of the directories locations are.
> But instead of using the variables defined there, all the RAs redefine
> (for example)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@/run/
> possibly with a different name.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> [...]
> A bunch of the directories locations are.
> But instead of using the variables defined there, all the RAs redefine
> (for example)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@/run/
> possibly with a different name.
Could you clarify a little? I thought much of this
On 6/27/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-06-27T22:06:30, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My feeling is that we are fundamentally abusing autoconf by having it
> generate RAs in this manner.
Point taken.
The paths (as really needed) in a centralized location
