Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I filed a bug on the subject and cc-ing to the ML and Alan
>> just in case if this might affect to the upcoming release.
>> http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1655
>>
>> As I wroted on the bugzilla, we found this during
And some more warnings:
2007/07/23_09:28:54 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function for
SIGCHLD was delayed 1010 ms (> 100 ms) before being called (GSource:
0x9c3af30)
On 7/23/07, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lrmd[5412]: 2007/07/23_09:27:13 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at
8342336
Thanks for the fix, Dejan. It works correctly now.
On 7/21/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Serge,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:12:08AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> apache RA in the last version of Heartbeat was updated with ability to
> scan HTTP config files to look up req
lrmd[5412]: 2007/07/23_09:27:13 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at
834233641 should have started at 834233541
What are they and how critical are they?
--
Serge Dubrouski.
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 7/20/07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On 7/18/07, Maxim Veksler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hello people,
>> >>
>> >> I'm looking for building Heartbeat 2.1.0 on redhat.
>> >> I've downloaded from http://hg.linux-ha.org/lha-
Keisuke MORI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I filed a bug on the subject and cc-ing to the ML and Alan
> just in case if this might affect to the upcoming release.
> http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1655
>
> As I wroted on the bugzilla, we found this during our regression test
Keisuke MORI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I filed a bug on the subject and cc-ing to the ML and Alan
> just in case if this might affect to the upcoming release.
> http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1655
>
> As I wroted on the bugzilla, we found this during our regression test
Hello, all
I'm trying the improvement of SNMP responce in hbagent...
[SNMP AGENT] Cache values where possible
While using net-snmp's snmp-walk tool to probe heartbeat I encountered
timeouts. It seems that this is caused by hbagent querying the
linux-ha core extensively in order to satisfy each
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:20:49PM +0900, DAIKI MATSUDA wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> I post patch files again, because I added a new feature to send the
> modified timeout values to other nodes. Its description is at the
> bottom. I could make the nodes that received the message over-write
> the ha.cf
