Re: [Linux-ha-dev] To avoid STONITH for a node which is doing kdump

2008-09-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 13:29, Satomi Taniguchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > Thank you for your reply! > > > Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > (snip) >> >> There is one missing bit though; a node not doing kdump needs to be >> STONITH'ed; so, failure of the kdump-stonith plugin should "esc

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Heartbeat 2.1.4 OpenBSD port

2008-09-01 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-08-26T10:36:36, Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > this time with appended tarball. > > Hi Sebastian, > > I thank you for the submission and apologize for the late recognition > thereof, but I w

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Cope with empty $RANDOM

2008-09-01 Thread David Lee
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2008-08-13T10:24:14, Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry, I've poked around a bit further and I no longer think that > > local is POSIX. > > People should simply chose whatever language it is they want to write > their scripts in

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Cope with empty $RANDOM

2008-09-01 Thread David Lee
(Sorry for delay, away on family holiday and other things; back today.) On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2008-08-07T09:41:25, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >var1=XXX > >var2=YYY > > > >my_function() { > > _mf_v1=$1 > > _mf_v2=$2 > >} > > >

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-09-01 Thread David Lee
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > here are my thoughts for 3.0: > > - Remove code which depends on pacemaker (mgmt, dopd, CIM/SNMP) > - Remove unmaintained code (telecom/). > > - Split up packages so heartbeat's cluster infrastructure layer can be > installed separately from > - s

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-09-01 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-09-01T15:48:07, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds good, Lars. Many thanks for your work on this. Thanks for your feedback! > o "v1". A vote to continue with it (even in "not maintained" status) for > the time being. Yes, no problems with that. Though maybe changing the de

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Vmware server 2.0 resource agent

2008-09-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Added. Thanks! 2008/8/13 Cristian Mammoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 2008/7/24 Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> To cover ourselves legally, I think we need a short note from your >> boss saying that your company is knows and is fine with you submitting >> this. >> And possibly one from yo

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-09-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sep 1, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2008-09-01T15:48:07, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sounds good, Lars. Many thanks for your work on this. Thanks for your feedback! o "v1". A vote to continue with it (even in "not maintained" status) for the time being.