On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Hannes Eder wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 17:13, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>> On 2009-07-21T17:24:56, Hannes Eder wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a li
hi,
thank you for your explanation.
a few more thoughts:
> +
> +
> +Memory available for incoming requests. In bytes.
> +
> +
> +/proc/fs/nfsd/max_block_size
> +
> +
> +
Q. is this enough to set a default value for
${OCF_RESKEY_nfs_max_block_size} ? i am asking because in other ra's,
there is a
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Hannes Eder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 17:13, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2009-07-21T17:24:56, Hannes Eder wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a little code
>>> cleanup. In this case the question arises whic
