On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:49:30PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > Hello Lars,
> >
> > On Thursday, November 18, 2010, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:11:08PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > > > Thanks,
>
> Adding the following patch
>
> --- lrmd.c 2010-11-19 17:51:44.0 +
> +++ ../../../lrmd.c 2010-11-24 20:40:49.351322794 +
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,9 @@
>
> register_pid(FALSE, sigterm_action);
>
> +
> + g_thread_init(NULL);
> +
> /* load RA plugins */
On 16:16, Wed 24 Nov 10, Ante Karamatić wrote:
> U Sri, 24. 11. 2010., u 10:52 +, Dave Williams je napisao/la:
>
> > I currently have a production clustered server down because of this and
> > the fact that ubuntu (I'm advised) have an inconsistently compiled set
> > of HA components. Certaint
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:43:05AM -0800, Bob Schatz wrote:
> Lars,
>
> Please take my opinions with a grain of salt. I am just trying to share my
> experiences. I am not sure if they apply here.
>
> I appreciate all of the hard work involved in LinuxHA and Pacemaker!
>
> Just to tell you whe
Lars,
Please take my opinions with a grain of salt. I am just trying to share my
experiences. I am not sure if they apply here.
I appreciate all of the hard work involved in LinuxHA and Pacemaker!
Just to tell you where I am coming from while I count down the minutes before a
holiday here in
Hi,
sure no problem we can name it firebird. Packaging it with the firebird
packages I don't really find a good idea, because not every user that needs
firebird 2.5 will use it in a cluster. Therefore I would appreciate it if it
would be packages with the pacemaker package, if that package include
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:10:33AM -0800, Bob Schatz wrote:
> I am curious.
>
> What is driving the need for more than 32 nodes? Are many people doing that
> or
> planning on doing that?
>
> In my experience, > 80% of the people just want 2 nodes to work reliability
> and
> more than 4 node
I am curious.
What is driving the need for more than 32 nodes? Are many people doing that
or
planning on doing that?
In my experience, > 80% of the people just want 2 nodes to work reliability and
more than 4 nodes is just a marketing requirement to put on a glossy handout.
Is that still th
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:18:27PM -0700, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking about a new unicast communications plugin that would
> work slightly differently from the current ucast plugin.
>
> It would take a filename giving the hostnames or ipv4 or ipv6 unicast
> addresses that
On 16:16, Wed 24 Nov 10, Ante Karamatić wrote:
> U Sri, 24. 11. 2010., u 10:52 +, Dave Williams je napisao/la:
>
> > I currently have a production clustered server down because of this and
> > the fact that ubuntu (I'm advised) have an inconsistently compiled set
> > of HA components. Certaint
Thanks. One more minor issue: does it have to be named "firebird25"? If
it's called just "firebird", then it's fine for it to support version
only 2.5 forward -- but you won't need to rename when 2.x for x>5 comes out.
An additional option would be to package this with Firebird, of course.
Cheers
Hi Florian,
thanks a lot for your quick reply, I fixed those little errors and added
a little feature that checks if the /var/run/firebird directory is
writeable by the OCF_RESKEY_user or not.
Hope this is better :)
Frank
On 24.11.2010 13:53, Florian Haas wrote:
Hi Frank,
Great contributi
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:49:30PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Lars,
>
> On Thursday, November 18, 2010, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:11:08PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > will work on that tomorrow.
> >
> > Done, and pushed.
> > P
U Sri, 24. 11. 2010., u 10:52 +, Dave Williams je napisao/la:
> I currently have a production clustered server down because of this and
> the fact that ubuntu (I'm advised) have an inconsistently compiled set
> of HA components. Certaintly both lucid and maverick released packages
> leave defu
On 14:18, Wed 24 Nov 10, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> The most plausible explanation is in this thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ha-dev&m=128765996706209&w=2
>
Thanks for your quick response Dejan,
I understand what the thread says - which is why I posted my findings
on the list. As I said it
Hello Lars,
On Thursday, November 18, 2010, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:11:08PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > Thanks,
> >
> > will work on that tomorrow.
>
> Done, and pushed.
> Please complain if something does not work as expected.
>
> Thanks for bringing it up,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:52:23AM +, Dave Williams wrote:
> On 10:35, Wed 24 Nov 10, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:03:33PM +, Dave Williams wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I have a problem that looks similar to that reported "possible deadlock
> > > in lr
Hi Frank,
Great contribution, thanks! RA looks pretty good overall; a few comments
inline:
On 2010-11-24 13:38, Frank Lazzarini wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> #
> # Firebird 2.5 OCF RA. Start Firebird 2.5 Superclassic server
> #
> #
> # Author: Frank Lazzarini
> #
> # Support: linux...
Hi all,
I've written a Resource Agent for Firebird 2.5 Superclassic Server. The
RA has the common switches meta-data, start, stop, monitor, reload,
validate-all, usage|help. I've written the RA with the default values as
if you would install Firebird 2.5 manually using the packages available
On 10:35, Wed 24 Nov 10, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:03:33PM +, Dave Williams wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a problem that looks similar to that reported "possible deadlock
> > in lrmd" on 21st Oct
> >
> > When running lradmin -C to list classes the first time it
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:03:33PM +, Dave Williams wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem that looks similar to that reported "possible deadlock
> in lrmd" on 21st Oct
>
> When running lradmin -C to list classes the first time it comes back
> immediately with the expected list e.g.
>
> r...@no
21 matches
Mail list logo
