Thanks for your comments.
Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb:
> On 2011-02-05T00:16:45, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
>> I do like this packet counter monitoring.
>
> So do I, but I'd just casually suggest that this may make sense as a
> daemon, or at least per physical NIC - instead of per virtual IP.
>
I
Thanks for your comments. I have attached an updated version, although
not everything has been worked in yet (see below).
Lars Ellenberg schrieb:
[..]
+ RX_PACKETS_NEW="`get_rx_packets`"
+ RX_PACKETS_OLD="$RX_PACKETS_NEW"
^^^ assign old here, only
ok, done.
+ for n in `se
On 02/11/2011 01:41 PM, Dominik Klein wrote:
> Maybe you applied the s/100/$slavescore patch someone sent a couple
> weeks ago. I used the last version from thread "New stateful RA:
> conntrackd" dated october 27th 3:29pm.
>
> Anyway, here's my version.
Applied and pushed with two minor edits. Th
Maybe you applied the s/100/$slavescore patch someone sent a couple
weeks ago. I used the last version from thread "New stateful RA:
conntrackd" dated october 27th 3:29pm.
Anyway, here's my version.
Regards
Dominik
On 02/11/2011 01:36 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-02-11 09:48, Dominik Klein
On 2011-02-11 09:48, Dominik Klein wrote:
> Hi Florian
>
>> it appears that the RA is good to be merged with just a few changes left
>> to be done.
>
> Great!
>
> [lots of exemplary role-model patch modifications]
>
> Regards
> Dominik
Thanks! For some reason the patch does not apply in my che
Hi Florian
> it appears that the RA is good to be merged with just a few changes left
> to be done.
Great!
> * Please fix the initialization to honor $OCF_FUNCTIONS_DIR and ditch
> the redundant locale initialization.
done
> * Please rename the parameters to follow the precendents set by other
