Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [ha-wg-technical] resource agents 3.9.1rc1 release

2011-06-08 Thread Keisuke MORI
Hi, Thank you for all your efforts for the new release. 2011/6/7 Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com: Several changes have been made to the build system and the spec file to accommodate both projects´ needs. The most noticeable change is the option to select all, linux-ha or rgmanager

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [ha-wg-technical] resource agents 3.9.1rc1 release

2011-06-08 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: Hi, On 6/8/2011 10:16 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote: Hi, Thank you for all your efforts for the new release. 2011/6/7 Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com: Several changes have been made to the build system and

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Postfix status (was Re: state of heartbeat resource agents)

2011-06-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 06/07/2011 04:16 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi All, I revised the first patch. Please confirm contents. hi! thanks. i'm currently checking and applying those patches step-by-step. thanks, raoul -- DI (FH)

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [ha-wg-technical] resource agents 3.9.1rc1 release

2011-06-08 Thread Florian Haas
On 06/08/2011 02:50 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: Hi, On 6/8/2011 10:16 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote: Hi, Thank you for all your efforts for the new release. 2011/6/7 Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com: Several changes have been made to the build system and the spec file to accommodate

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [ha-wg-technical] resource agents 3.9.1rc1 release

2011-06-08 Thread Florian Haas
On 06/08/2011 03:06 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: Hi, On 6/8/2011 10:16 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote: Hi, Thank you for all your efforts for the new release. 2011/6/7 Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com: Several

[Linux-ha-dev] RC1 announcement for Heartbeat 3.0.5

2011-06-08 Thread Lars Ellenberg
About two month ago, dealing with a bug report of some paying customer, I fixed some long standing bugs in the heartbeat communication layer that caused heartbeat to segfault, and other bad behaviour. These bugs where triggered by misbehaving API clients, respectively massive packet loss on the

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Patch to ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 to check if link status is up

2011-06-08 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Alexander, On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:42:30PM +0200, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote: Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.04.2011 14:35:34: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:15:16PM +0100, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote: Hi, Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 18.03.2011 14:31:08: Hi,

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Postfix status

2011-06-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 07.06.2011 04:40, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi All, I contribute my last patch.(patch3) This is a patch for the sources which applied patch 1. It is the patch which output the details of the error in log. hi! to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker. moreover,

[Linux-ha-dev] postfix's postfix_validate_all and initial monitor action

2011-06-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
hi! in postfix_validate_all() we check if postfix's config file and queue/data directory exist. the configuration and these directories might reside on a shared storage which should be mounted before starting postfix. e.g. primitive m-mail-fs ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem \ params

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] postfix's postfix_validate_all and initial monitor action

2011-06-08 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:27:29PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: hi! in postfix_validate_all() we check if postfix's config file and queue/data directory exist. the configuration and these directories might reside on a shared storage which should be mounted before starting

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] postfix patches merged

2011-06-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 08.06.2011 19:46, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: i slightly modified hideo-san's patches, merged them with my repository and put them online at https://github.com/raoulbhatia/resource-agents/ dejan: thanks for your review. i addressed your comments in the last two commits. see

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] postfix's postfix_validate_all and initial monitor action

2011-06-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 08.06.2011 22:14, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: as far as i can tell, the ocf ra behaves correctly and returns $OCF_NOT_RUNNING: postfix_validate_all ret=$? #echo debug[$1:$ret] LSB_STATUS_STOPPED=3 if [ $ret -ne $OCF_SUCCESS ]; then case $1 in stop) exit $OCF_SUCCESS ;;

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Postfix status

2011-06-08 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Raoul, Thank you for the merge of the patch. to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker. moreover, postfix logs to the mail facility itself. what are the reasons for separately capturing and logging all output? When a problem occurred, the output of detailed log helps an

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [ha-wg-technical] resource agents 3.9.1rc1 release

2011-06-08 Thread Keisuke MORI
Hi, 2011/6/8 Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com: Why is the ldirectord package disabled on RHEL environment? I would expect that it would be built as same as (linux-ha) resource-agents-1.0.4 so that we can use the upcoming 3.9.1 as the upgrade version. Because ldirectord requires libnet

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [ha-wg-technical] resource agents 3.9.1rc1 release

2011-06-08 Thread Keisuke MORI
2011/6/8 Digimer li...@alteeve.com: On 06/08/2011 09:48 AM, Florian Haas wrote: I realize I'm bikeshedding, but my preference would be for 3.9 for this one, and 4.0 to implement the new standard. Like Fabio originally suggested. Cheers, Florian Given that x.0 has long meant new stuff, I'd