Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH 0/2] LVM: Fix activation for clustered VGs

2011-11-30 Thread Florian Haas
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote: Lars (both), Dejan, Nils, could you take a quick peek at whether the following (untested) patches look like they're making sense? The more important one is obviously the second one. Nils, could you apply those patches

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Medium: LVM: force dmevent monitoring for clones

2011-11-30 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2011-11-28T21:14:22, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote: Seems to make sense. of course, an alternative would be to add a Conflicts: lvm2 x.y.z to the package on the respective versions to make sure it's only installed with a fixed lvm2 package ...? Surely you're joking.