Hi All,
I made the patch which revised the old next problem.
* http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/70262
In consideration of influence when a parameter was changed, I replace only a
value of timeout.
Please confirm my patch.
And please commit a patch.
Best Regards,
Hideo
Hi Hideo-san,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 06:21:00PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi All,
I made the patch which revised the old next problem.
* http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/70262
In consideration of influence when a parameter was changed, I replace only
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comment.
It looks like a wrong place for a fix. Shouldn't crmd send all
environment? It is only by chance that we have the timeout value
available in this function.
In the case of stop, crmd does not ask lrmd for the substitution of the
parameter. .
(snip)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:45 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comment.
It looks like a wrong place for a fix. Shouldn't crmd send all
environment? It is only by chance that we have the timeout value
available in this function.
In the case of stop, crmd does
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
When stopping, you always want to use the old parameters (think of
someone changing 'ip' for an IPaddr resource).
Options that are interpreted by the crmd or lrmd are a different
matter which resulted in:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
When stopping, you always want to use the old parameters (think of
someone changing 'ip' for an IPaddr resource).
Options that are interpreted by the crmd or lrmd are a different
matter
Hi Andrew,
All right.
Will you apply this correction to 1.0 of Pacemaker?
Sure. We'll pick it up for .13
Many Thanks!!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Fri, 2011/12/16, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
