On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> It does, but the exit status is always '0', which makes 'service' binary
>>> unusable for monitoring the status of the service without parsing the
>>> command output.
>>
>> 10 head
>
What do you say?
commit e57f9f7a7b8f838e750864ce332436a0f36321d7
Author: Lars Ellenberg
Date: Mon Feb 20 20:38:49 2012 +0100
Medium: Filesystem: improve read/write checks for CHECK_LEVEL 10, 20
Some devices don't support 512 byte direct writes anymore,
the "physical" block si
Hi Dejan,
20.02.2012 20:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:33:52AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> Hi Dejan, all,
>>
>> 02.02.2012 19:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Sorry for crossposting, but can anybody comment on the matter
>>>
Hi Vladislav,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:33:52AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi Dejan, all,
>
> 02.02.2012 19:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Sorry for crossposting, but can anybody comment on the matter
> > bellow? Thanks!
>
> Running LVM operations can fail monitor
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> It does, but the exit status is always '0', which makes 'service' binary
>> unusable for monitoring the status of the service without parsing the
>> command output.
>
> 10 head
> 20 desk
> 30 add
> 40 goto 10
I believe you went through th
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Ante Karamatic wrote:
> On 17.02.2012 11:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> Tangential question... but does upstart also implement the "service" binary?
>> As in "service pacemaker start" ?
>
> It does, but the exit status is always '0', which makes 'service' binary
>
