I am also the DHCP sever, and access to everything north also flows thru me.
On 10/26/08 1:40 PM, "Andrew Beekhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 19:37, tje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Through an interface that *must* be up (or we
gt; wrote:
> ethtool?
>
>> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:23:09 +0200
>> From: "Andrew Beekhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> why the reluctance to use ping?
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 21:25, tje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why the reluctance to use ping?
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 21:25, tje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm in a situation where I don't have an address that can work as a ping
>> address (don't ask). In this case I really j
n Reichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:25:32PM -0700, tje wrote:
>> I'm in a situation where I don't have an address that can work as a ping
>> address (don't ask). In this case I really just want to detect if the
>> freak
I'm in a situation where I don't have an address that can work as a ping
address (don't ask). In this case I really just want to detect if the
freakin ethernet link is gone. I've looked at how ipfail works inside, and
I've looked at the description of pingd options - both seem to require a
node to
