On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:42:35PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:52:49AM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > (2010/06/04 23:18), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri,
On Monday 07 June 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:52:49AM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > (2010/06/04 23:18), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > >> On Friday 04 June 20
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:52:49AM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi
>
> (2010/06/04 23:18), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >> On Friday 04 June 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >>> Hi Takatoshi-san,
> >>>
> >>> On
Hi
(2010/06/04 23:18), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> On Friday 04 June 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi Takatoshi-san,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:19:42PM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
Hello
I sugge
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Friday 04 June 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi Takatoshi-san,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:19:42PM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I suggest to add a parameter which decides executing fsck
On Friday 04 June 2010, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 02:47 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >> Remind me of the VCS repo for that lustre_server agent please?
> >
> > Hrmm, I still didn't post it here. An older version is in the lustre
> > bugzilla:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi
On 06/04/2010 02:47 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> Remind me of the VCS repo for that lustre_server agent please?
>
> Hrmm, I still didn't post it here. An older version is in the lustre bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20807
>
> I also attach it to this mail, the "_to_be
On Friday 04 June 2010, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 02:16 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > That brings up and idea here, with extX, we could easily use
> >
> > dumpe2fs -h | grep "Filesystem state:"
> >
> > to check if fsck needs to be run. So the agent could refuse to mount the
> > decide and
On 06/04/2010 02:16 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> That brings up and idea here, with extX, we could easily use
>
> dumpe2fs -h | grep "Filesystem state:"
>
> to check if fsck needs to be run. So the agent could refuse to mount the
> decide and make you run it manually in the foreground without
On Friday 04 June 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Takatoshi-san,
>
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:19:42PM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I suggest to add a parameter which decides executing fsck
> > as user's policy in Filesystem RA.
> >
> > Because, current RA dose not check e
Hi Takatoshi-san,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:19:42PM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hello
>
> I suggest to add a parameter which decides executing fsck
> as user's policy in Filesystem RA.
>
> Because, current RA dose not check ext3 because executing fsck depends on
> filesystem.
> But ext3 so
Hello
I suggest to add a parameter which decides executing fsck
as user's policy in Filesystem RA.
Because, current RA dose not check ext3 because executing fsck depends on
filesystem.
But ext3 sometimes is broken and remounted read-only although it has journal, so
I want to decide myself executi
12 matches
Mail list logo
