On 2011-11-28T21:14:22, Florian Haas wrote:
> > Seems to make sense. of course, an alternative would be to add a
> > "Conflicts: lvm2 < x.y.z" to the package on the respective versions to
> > make sure it's only installed with a fixed lvm2 package ...?
> Surely you're joking. resource-agents does
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2011-11-25T18:38:06, Florian Haas wrote:
>
>> Starting a clustered volume with monitoring disabled is not allowed:
>>
>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2010-March/msg00289.html
>>
>> Which would be fine, as activation/moni
On 2011-11-25T18:38:06, Florian Haas wrote:
> Starting a clustered volume with monitoring disabled is not allowed:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2010-March/msg00289.html
>
> Which would be fine, as activation/monitoring = 1 ships as the default
> in lvm.conf. However, at least so
Starting a clustered volume with monitoring disabled is not allowed:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2010-March/msg00289.html
Which would be fine, as activation/monitoring = 1 ships as the default
in lvm.conf. However, at least some versions of LVM seem to ignore this,
throwing an error
