Hi Dejan,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[snip]
I see. For suse you can open an enhancement bugzilla at
bugzilla.novell.com and attach the patch.
I reported on
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445870
Thanks for your advice!
Best Regards,
Satomi TANIGUCHI
_
Hi Dejan,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Satomi-san,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:44:15PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Thank you very very much for taking care of it!
I'm posting a patch to make the condition for searching and getting the value of
kdump_check_user more strictly.
It's
Hi Satomi-san,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:44:15PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thank you very very much for taking care of it!
>
> I'm posting a patch to make the condition for searching and getting the value
> of
> kdump_check_user more strictly.
> It's for Linux-HA Dev a29f1b7
Hi Dejan,
Thank you very very much for taking care of it!
I'm posting a patch to make the condition for searching and getting the value of
kdump_check_user more strictly.
It's for Linux-HA Dev a29f1b78dfe5.
I'm sorry to bother you again.
And I attached a patch for mkdumprd with almost the same
Hi Satomi-san,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:06:27PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thank you so much for your comments!
> I modified and tested the patch.
>
>
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi Satomi-san,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:55:57PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
>>> Hi l
Hi Keisuke-san,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:10:22PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> When we discussed about this feature at the Cluster Summit,
> you mentioned that there're some issues in stonithd regarding to
> the STONITH escalation.
I'm not aware of any issues. Perhaps they're from
Hi Lars,
When we discussed about this feature at the Cluster Summit,
you mentioned that there're some issues in stonithd regarding to
the STONITH escalation.
Could you summarise the issues again please?
And if you have any particular test cases that may not work well
in your mind, we will add th
Hi Dejan,
Thank you so much for your comments!
I modified and tested the patch.
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Satomi-san,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:55:57PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
Hi lists,
I'm posting a STONITH plugin which checks whether the target node is kdumping
or not.
There are
Hi Satomi-san,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:55:57PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
> Hi lists,
>
> I'm posting a STONITH plugin which checks whether the target node is kdumping
> or not.
> There are some steps to use this, but I believe this plugin is helpful for
> failure analysis.
> See attached
Hi Satomi-san,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:55:57PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
> Hi lists,
>
> I'm posting a STONITH plugin which checks whether the target node is kdumping
> or not.
> There are some steps to use this, but I believe this plugin is helpful for
> failure analysis.
> See attached
Hi lists,
I'm posting a STONITH plugin which checks whether the target node is kdumping
or not.
There are some steps to use this, but I believe this plugin is helpful for
failure analysis.
See attached README for details about how to use this.
There are 2 patches.
The patch named "kdumpcheck.patc
11 matches
Mail list logo
