Hi,
Forgive my ignorance, but I'd really appreciate if somebody could
explain the following excerpt from Filesystem:
# By sending both signals twice, we eliminate the need
# for `sleep` after them.
for sig in SIGTERM SIGTERM SIGKILL SIGKILL; do
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Forgive my ignorance, but I'd really appreciate if somebody could
explain the following excerpt from Filesystem:
# By sending both signals twice, we eliminate the need
# for `sleep` after them.
for sig in SIGTERM SIGTERM SIGKILL S
On 2006-06-16T21:14:49, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Forgive my ignorance, but I'd really appreciate if somebody could
> >explain the following excerpt from Filesystem:
> >
> ># By sending both signals twice, we eliminate the need
>
On 2006-06-16T21:14:49, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you want to produce a patch that incorporates these ideas for us to
> all complain about jointly -- I mean incorporate? ;-)
I've just committed a largeish patch which does address all the points
raised, and some minor other o
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:48:29PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2006-06-16T21:14:49, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you want to produce a patch that incorporates these ideas for us to
> > all complain about jointly -- I mean incorporate? ;-)
>
> I've just commit
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:48:29PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-16T21:14:49, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you want to produce a patch that incorporates these ideas for us to
all complain about jointly -- I mean incorporate? ;-)
I've
On 2006-06-23T15:04:13, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you can remove the last two SIGKILLs here:
>
> for sig in SIGTERM SIGTERM SIGTERM SIGKILL SIGKILL SIGKILL; do
Probably the last one could be removed - the first SIGKILL might need a
second or two before the kern
