Re: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: pgsql.in patch

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 12/4/06, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But earlier you said to not use crm-stable :-) And I made a mistake in my email. The patch was against 2.0.7 from heartbeat repositary, sorry. ah. np. On 12/4/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/06, Serge Dubrouski

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: pgsql.in patch

2006-12-04 Thread Serge Dubrouski
But earlier you said to not use crm-stable :-) And I made a mistake in my email. The patch was against 2.0.7 from heartbeat repositary, sorry. On 12/4/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, little bit corrected version. > >

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: pgsql.in patch

2006-12-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 11/28/06, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, little bit corrected version. On 11/27/06, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a patch for pgsql.in. The patch actually combines previous > one and new one (ctl_opt added to support additional options for > pg_ct

[Linux-ha-dev] Re: pgsql.in patch

2006-11-28 Thread Serge Dubrouski
Sorry, little bit corrected version. On 11/27/06, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Attached is a patch for pgsql.in. The patch actually combines previous one and new one (ctl_opt added to support additional options for pg_ctl) and is built agains pgsql.in file from 2.0.6 distribution (