Hi,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:49:24AM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> On 12.08.2009 17:32, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> *snip*
> >> because then something is broken. i reworked this part now
> >> and am checking if the directory exists, "[ -d ... ]" return<> 0, at
> >> least on my linux box us
On 12.08.2009 17:32, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
*snip*
>> because then something is broken. i reworked this part now
>> and am checking if the directory exists, "[ -d ... ]" return<> 0, at
>> least on my linux box using bash.
>
> This is from a diff:
>
> +[ -d "$queue" ] || return 1 # check if q
Hi Raoul,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:46:14PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm reposting the postfix ocf ra as i feel that my works are complete.
>
> dejan posted some comments in his last email which i will address:
>
> >> i'm now checking more indepth for:
> >> > 1. empty queue_
*bump*
On 07/27/2009 02:46 PM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm reposting the postfix ocf ra as i feel that my works are complete.
>
> dejan posted some comments in his last email which i will address:
>
>>> i'm now checking more indepth for:
1. empty queue_directory
>>
>> For moni
hi,
i'm reposting the postfix ocf ra as i feel that my works are complete.
dejan posted some comments in his last email which i will address:
>> i'm now checking more indepth for:
>> > 1. empty queue_directory
>
> For monitor? Why?
because then something is broken. i reworked this part now
and
