Andrew's measured 10% performance increase suggests that we should make
this the default, IMHO, at least on Linux: apparently, our glibc
allocators are better than heartbeats.
I've been running tests with it and not found any issues.
I'll probably make this the default on SLES, but think it'd mak
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Andrew's measured 10% performance increase suggests that we should make
> this the default, IMHO, at least on Linux: apparently, our glibc
> allocators are better than heartbeats.
>
> I've been running tests with it and not found any issues.
>
> I'll probably make this
On 2/21/07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Andrew's measured 10% performance increase suggests that we should make
> this the default, IMHO, at least on Linux: apparently, our glibc
> allocators are better than heartbeats.
>
> I've been running tests with it
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> > Andrew's measured 10% performance increase suggests that we should make
>> > this the default, IMHO, at least on Linux: apparently, our glibc
>> > allocators are better than heartbeats.
>
On 2007-02-21T08:09:43, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is EXACTLY what it's supposed to do for months or years at a time
> - and in fact what it does do for months or years at a time.
>
> The fact that _under test conditions_ it consumes a bit more is a bit
> artificial, IMHO.
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-02-21T08:09:43, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Which is EXACTLY what it's supposed to do for months or years at a time
>> - and in fact what it does do for months or years at a time.
>>
>> The fact that _under test conditions_ it consumes a bit m
On 2007-02-22T06:55:37, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't mean that AT ALL. Failover time is normally 90% dominated by
> resource agent time. And increasing CPU time in a multi-process,
> multi-processor situation where networking delays and scheduling delays
> are typically
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-02-22T06:55:37, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't mean that AT ALL. Failover time is normally 90% dominated by
>> resource agent time. And increasing CPU time in a multi-process,
>> multi-processor situation where networking delays and
On 2007-02-22T16:05:51, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has it caught bugs recently?
> Andrew's been writing most of the newer code. Newer code has more bugs
> than older code. Andrew has it disabled. What a surprise that it isn't
> finding any bugs in his code.
That comment is n
On 2/23/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-02-22T16:05:51, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has it caught bugs recently?
> Andrew's been writing most of the newer code. Newer code has more bugs
> than older code. Andrew has it disabled. What a surprise that
10 matches
Mail list logo
