On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> Hi,
> to my knowledge OCF *requires* a method monitor while status is optional
> (or what is it really for? heritage, compatibility, ...)
Yes, patch applied.
Cheers,
Dejan
> Shouldn't the ocft configs check for status ?
>
> -hol
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 11:01 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> Hi,
> to my knowledge OCF *requires* a method monitor while status is optional
> (or what is it really for? heritage, compatibility, ...)
>
> Shouldn't the ocft configs check for status ?
As Andrew already noted: of course I mean *monitor
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> Hi,
> to my knowledge OCF *requires* a method monitor while status is optional
> (or what is it really for? heritage, compatibility, ...)
>
> Shouldn't the ocft configs check for status ?
Yes, unless its trying to talk to an LSB resource.
Hi,
to my knowledge OCF *requires* a method monitor while status is optional
(or what is it really for? heritage, compatibility, ...)
Shouldn't the ocft configs check for status ?
-holger
diff -r 722c8a7a03e9 tools/ocft/apache
--- a/tools/ocft/apache Fri Feb 11 18:49:09 2011 +0100
+++ b/tools/oc
