Re: running programs on REDHAT 5.2

1999-04-20 Thread Bob Nielsen
It probably isn't in your $PATH. Try giving the full path (or if you are in that directory, try './xfbb.sh'). Bob, W6SWE On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, JOSE NG LEE wrote: > > I had installed before Linux Slackware 3.5 and run an executable file > without any problems typing the name of the file. A few

running programs on REDHAT 5.2

1999-04-20 Thread JOSE NG LEE
I had installed before Linux Slackware 3.5 and run an executable file without any problems typing the name of the file. A few days ago, I installed Redhat 5.2 Linux installation and try to run an executable file but get an error. typed: xfbb.sh message: bash:xfbb.sh: command not found type

Re: APRS for Linux?

1999-04-20 Thread Richard Adams
According to Mike Bilow: While burning my CPU. > > > > Jonathan NAYLOR wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: > > JN> I hate to be a spoil sport, but the implication in your mail > JN> that Bill Gates was the first to produce commercial software > JN> and that before everything was free and op

Fiel Day and QRP

1999-04-20 Thread Ed Lawson
Having never operated QRP during FD, I am curious if the QRP freq. are honored at all as a band segment for QRP stations. Do QRP OPs did to stay in the area? Or do we have to slug it out with all the 100 W stations? I would also assume that 40, 20 and 15 are the preferred bands. TIA Ed Lawson K1

ampr_extractor and bind-8 cache files

1999-04-20 Thread Robin Gilks
Greetings all I've recently updated to bind-8 for the ampr.org DNS I run on the local hub, gb7ipd. This is running live off the net and works great as a straight DNS however two problems arise... 1. I'd like to extract the UK parts of the ampr.org domain using ampr_extractor from Simon Mudd (or

Re: Proposal to abandon the HAM-HOWTO in its current form.

1999-04-20 Thread terry
On 20 Apr, Mike Bilow wrote: > There have been attempts to do this sort of thing before, most notably Bruce > Perens' "Linux for Hams" project. What really worries me is that a decent book > of 100-200 pages on using Linux for ham radio would tend to be too short, and a > proper treatment would

Re: Linux and ZIP drives

1999-04-20 Thread terry
On 20 Apr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > My sincerest thanks to everyone who responded with positive comments, and > even to those with nothing nice to say, in response to my request for > assistance. I really appreciate the outpouring of help that came forth, in > the spirit of amateur rad

Re: Proposal to abandon the HAM-HOWTO in its current form.

1999-04-20 Thread terry
On 20 Apr, Mike Bilow wrote: > Handbook or otherwise. A lot of this would depend upon the length. At the > risk of suggesting myself into a project, it might be worth considering a > Linux-specific feature in the ARRL Handbook in connection with the "computers > in ham radio" coverage, of which

Re: AX25 and RedHat

1999-04-20 Thread terry
On 19 Apr, Bob Nielsen wrote: > net-tools 1.51 (from Debian potato) appears to support ROSE: thanks Bob, I'll check that out and see whether the support actually works and what they've chosen to include. Terry -- Linux: standard and fully integrated support for Amateur Radio protocols "Pengu

Re: APRS for Linux?

1999-04-20 Thread Martin Moerman Linux Ham
Guys, can you please send this kind of emails privatly since this has nothing to do with linux and hams.. I am allready getting so many SPAM emails and this just adds Thnx A fellow ham Martin PD1AJE On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Mike Bilow wrote: > > > Dirk Koopman wrote in a message to Mike Bil

Re: Proposal to abandon the HAM-HOWTO in its current form.

1999-04-20 Thread Terry Dawson
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:56:00PM -, Mike Bilow wrote: > Jameson Burt wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: > JB> Because the HAM-HOWTO has not been updated in 2 years, someone > JB> new should take over its maintenance. I can think of a couple > JB> extra class HAMs who spend much time writ

Re: Linux and ZIP drives

1999-04-20 Thread Karl F. Larsen
Assuming you get a constant ip number your going to work fine. My experiance has been that ISP's want extra money for 100% use of their modem and getting you a ip number. The 56k modem will be plenty fast for a gateway. On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } } } My sinceres

Re: APRS for Linux?

1999-04-20 Thread Karl F. Larsen
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Mike Bilow wrote: } } } Jonathan NAYLOR wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: } } JN> I hate to be a spoil sport, but the implication in your mail } JN> that Bill Gates was the first to produce commercial software } JN> and that before everything was free and open is esse

Proposal to abandon the HAM-HOWTO in its current form.

1999-04-20 Thread Mike Bilow
Jameson Burt wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: JB> The HAM-HOWTO should at least appear to be more recent than JB> April 1, 1997. To ease preparing documents, I write scripts to JB> include numerous documents in LaTeX, from which I port the JB> LaTeX documents to other formats (like HTM

Proposal to abandon the HAM-HOWTO in its current form.

1999-04-20 Thread Mike Bilow
Bloom, Jon, KE3Z wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: > I'd be interested to know if the ARRL would be interested in > publishing something of this nature? BJ > Quite possibly, particularly if what we are talking about is BJ > just using existing PostScript and wrapping some cover art BJ >

Re: Linux and ZIP drives

1999-04-20 Thread w7ntf
My sincerest thanks to everyone who responded with positive comments, and even to those with nothing nice to say, in response to my request for assistance. I really appreciate the outpouring of help that came forth, in the spirit of amateur radio. I use an IDE drive, so am confident that it

APRS for Linux?

1999-04-20 Thread Mike Bilow
Jonathan NAYLOR wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: JN> I hate to be a spoil sport, but the implication in your mail JN> that Bill Gates was the first to produce commercial software JN> and that before everything was free and open is essentially JN> wrong (despit what Levy says). Yes, but

APRS for Linux?

1999-04-20 Thread Mike Bilow
Dirk Koopman wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: DK> It was only after said teams of system programmers got OS DK> reasonably stable and shared the results that IBM were able to DK> decide that they would no longer provide source and start DK> charging squillions (whatever happened to iebu

Proposal to abandon the HAM-HOWTO in its current form.

1999-04-20 Thread Mike Bilow
Terry Dawson wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: TD> It really doesn't matter the significance. I've already TD> registered the "Radio Amateurs Guide" (RAG) as a project TD> with the LDP coordinator. I've done nothing with it for a TD> couple of years because really, it wasn't clear to me tha

JNOS-FBB problem solved (50%)

1999-04-20 Thread cfl . mike
I have solved the problem to make FBB happy and start forwarding to my JNOS/Linux box. I started the rxecho daemon, echoing packets between the ax0 internal kiss interface and bpq0 port, thus naking I1YLM-8 (ie. fbb) and I1YLM-15 (ie. JNOS) ditecly, without having the 'trying...' message that see

Re: sattrack

1999-04-20 Thread Jonathan NAYLOR
> Hi Jonathan, try amsat.org for the 2 line element sets. Looks like your > interesested in the Kansas City Tracker and are trying sattelite packet. Sorry Karl, wrong. I started doing Satellite packet in about 1993 and used a TrackBox for antenna tracking. I stopped a few years later. This p

Re: sattrack

1999-04-20 Thread Klaus Kudielka
Jonathan NAYLOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW can someone point me at where to get the (complete) two-line elements > on the net ? http://celestrak.com/pub/elements/ -Klaus