Re: radio.linux.org.au

Just for the record, your site refreshes with 4-5 seconds here in the US. Nice Job Dennis A. Lauzon (kd1ca) North East TCP Association / Vice President IP Address Coordinator 44.56/16 44.44/16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

No Subject

-- Subject: Re: Axattach, where? References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

Re: radio.linux.org.au

On 7 Aug, Riley Williams wrote: Quick apology on my part - it's not you that's the problem... That's ok. Not with that 25-27 second lag en route, no... There are some things we can do to make life a little easier though. We can muck with some http headers that relate to proxy/cache

Kantronics Data Engine Schematic

I have a Data Engine that took a lightning hit and now I need a good quality schematic in order to get it repaired. I have a blurry one that is not really readible that came with the unit. Can anyone send me a pdf or similar image that I can print out. Thankls... Phil

Re: Cept calls

No Robin contacting immigration wont stop me getting back !!! But contacting Customs and Excise might :-) -- 73 de g1sog Richard ~~~ Amateur radio callsign: G1SOG Home BBS: G1SOG@GB7SDN.#49.GBR.EU

LinKT-0.6.1 compile error

Hello, I'm running RedHat Linux 6.0 ax25-utils-2.1.42a-3.i386.rpm One month ago I compilled LinKT-0.6.0 successfully. Now, tried to compile LinKT-0.6.1 and I've got following errors: make[3]: Entering directory `/root/linkt-0.6.1/linkt' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include

Virtual Netrom circiut/Ip over Netrom

I haven't seen anything on this so here is my question: I have the standard ax25 tools, version 2.1.42 or whatever that is, and I am trying to set up a link to someone using TCP/IP carried over netrom, for the netrom man page: IP traffic may be stacked on top of NET/ROM frames using a

Re: ANNOUNCE: dgipip - dynamic IPIP gateway client/server for Linux

Hi Terry. I see from your second message that you accidentally posted this to the wrong mailing list, but it hasn't appeared in linux-hams yet, so I've responded to the one that has appeared and forwarded my reply to both lists. Future comments only expected in linux-hams though... As a