Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server!

1999-09-28 Thread Andrew Benham
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, M Taylor wrote: In Canada an encrypted telnet, ssh, SSL, or encrypted SMTP or POP3 would likely violate Radiocommunication Regulations section 47b: 47. A person who operates radio apparatus that is licensed in the amateur radio service may only ... (b) use a code or

Re: Baycom and Linux?

1999-09-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:09:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wich SuSE-Version are you running? On my SuSE 6.2 there are the /dev/bc* devices, even without running a baycom device, as there are installed by the devs-package: They exist but they will not be used. The kernel will not

netrom and 2.2.x kernels

1999-09-28 Thread James S. Kaplan KG7FU
I know it's been posted before... Could someone please refresh me with archived messages and/or a rundown on "how-to" netrom nodes with 2.2.x kernels? Running SuSE 6.2 beta 2 (Kai?) Thanks, - James S. Kaplan KG7FU Eugene Oregon USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: netrom and 2.2.x kernels

1999-09-28 Thread Tomi Manninen
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, James S. Kaplan KG7FU wrote: Could someone please refresh me with archived messages and/or a rundown on "how-to" netrom nodes with 2.2.x kernels? Just like before? There are no fundamental changes in the NET/ROM support. You do have to use recent lib/tools/apps to get

Re: Baycom and Linux?

1999-09-28 Thread Kai Altenfelder
On Tue, Sep 28, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:09:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wich SuSE-Version are you running? On my SuSE 6.2 there are the /dev/bc* devices, even without running a baycom device, as there are installed by the devs-package: They exist but

Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server!

1999-09-28 Thread Dirk Koopman
On 28-Sep-99 Andrew Benham wrote: The encryption schemes around these days use published codes/ciphers, it is merely the keys which are secret. I don't know whether this is a legal nicety or not - you decide. It doesn't really matter, any kind of public key cryptography whether used for

Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server!

1999-09-28 Thread aa6qn
Greetings, I and many others have been working on a SANS document that talks about a step by step instruction on securing a Linux server. This may be of interest to some of you especially those who are installing a Linux server for the first time on the inet. I am not sure when it will be

Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server!

1999-09-28 Thread Samuel A. Falvo II
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Dirk Koopman wrote: What they are actually afraid of, reading between the lines, is steganography: ie. hiding messages inside of largish blocks of binary data, which exactly what a public key really is. No, that's winnowing.

Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server!

1999-09-28 Thread Samuel A. Falvo II
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 11:12:11AM -0300, M Taylor wrote: To control access, I would make certain that you use a recent kernel, 2.2.12 works well for me, and have all necessary distribution's patches and updates installed. You can use tcp_wrappers for "course" access control such 44.*.*.* vs.

AX.25 Layer 1

1999-09-28 Thread Samuel A. Falvo II
"physical" layer. Thanks. == KC5TJA/6 | -| TEAM DOLPHIN |- DM13 | Samuel A. Falvo II QRP-L #1447| http://www.dolphin.openprojects.net

Re: AX.25 Layer 1

1999-09-28 Thread Samuel A. Falvo II
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:56:30AM -0700, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote: MIME-Version: 1.0 "physical" layer. Thanks. WHOA! This came out all mangled up. Hope this messages gets through OK. I'm looking for the physical characteristics for AX.25, as used on the VHF bands. Any ideas? Would

Problems compiling ax25-utils-2.1.42a

1999-09-28 Thread Jaime Robles
Hello all! I am having BIG problems with the last ax25-utils... Since i update to linux 2.2.12 (from 2.0.36) my ax25 connection stopt working... I only used "call" to connect the DX-cluster, but for a week or less i have been "fighting" the PC and i have been unable to make the call work! The

RE: Still need DNS help! (was: HAM related DNS problem)

1999-09-28 Thread David J Brown
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Schelander Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:11 PM I would like to have a configuration where I can list the names for local ham stations here (within ampr.org) and forward only if requests

Re: AX.25 Layer 1

1999-09-28 Thread Dirk Koopman
On 28-Sep-99 Samuel A. Falvo II wrote: I'm looking for the physical characteristics for AX.25, as used on the VHF bands. Any ideas? Would they be on tapr.org? (Of course, I'll look there anyway, but it doesn't hurt to ask.) layer 1 = bell 202 tones. -- Dirk-Jan Koopman, Tobit Computer

Re: AX.25 Layer 1

1999-09-28 Thread Samuel A. Falvo II
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 10:20:45PM +0100, Dirk Koopman wrote: layer 1 = bell 202 tones. Which are? == KC5TJA/6 | -| TEAM DOLPHIN |- DM13 | Samuel A. Falvo II

Re: Baycom and Linux?

1999-09-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:46:19PM +0200, Kai Altenfelder wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:09:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wich SuSE-Version are you running? On my SuSE 6.2 there are the /dev/bc* devices, even without running a baycom

How to stop the automatic sending of mail about AX25-ham please ?

1999-09-28 Thread PHILIPPART, Sebastien
Hello all. I'm looking for the way to stop the automatic sending of mail from vger.rutgers.edu about linux - ax25 - ham radio. The reason is the wrong e-mail than i have gave when i suscribed the mail-news of "linux - ax25 - ham radio". I someone could help me, it