On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 09:45:01AM -0400, Michel Beaudry wrote:
> clocks = 0x08
This means TX clock source = TX clock pin and RX clock source = RX clock
pin. But you seem to want something else:
> I am not sure about the clock and speed settings;the b port is interrupt
> driven and the p
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 11:14:41AM -0400, Michel Beaudry wrote:
> Ive compiled the kernel with dmascc driver and the kernel detects the
> card as dmascc0 and dmascc1, I tried different combinations of speed and
> clocks with dmascc_cfg dmascc0 but the card always keys the radio for
> approx 30 sec
Hi,
I'm glad to announce dmascc version 1.27.
Major improvements:
S5SCC/DMA support.
Ability to debounce the DCD line.
Ported to 2.3/2.4 kernels.
Please get it from http://www.nt.tuwien.ac.at/~kkudielk/Linux/ and give
it a try.
-Klaus
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 12:13:38PM +, Jorge Matias wrote:
> I have "ax25rtctl" in the cron to expire stations last heard for more
> than 5 minutes. The problem is that ax25rtd sometimes crashes, I think
> when it doesn't any IP routing entry in its database.
I'll look into this, but proba
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 09:58:22PM +0200, Giampaolo Bellini wrote:
>
> Hello...
>
>I have a problem with ax25rtd... when I try to run the daemon, I get an: "bind
>Control socket: no such file or directory"
Most likely, the directory /var/ax25/ax25rtd/ does not exist.
73 de Klaus
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Robert Schelander wrote:
> BUT: How to associate an scc device to the appropriate port in
> the axports configuration file?
Network devices and AX.25 ports are assiciated via the hardware address
of the device, in your case OE8RSQ.
73 de Klaus OE1KIB
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 07:59:58AM -0700, John Feist wrote:
> With the Ottawa PI-2 not being available (TAPR was going to pick up the
> kit ?) and the PackeTwin going out of production. Where does one go to
> find a SCC8530 driven interface that uses DMA access? Is there a
> commercial product? (s
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 08:50:08AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> I thought that PTs only were able to set the DMA to 1 or 3.
Me too. BTW, support for DMA 0 on the S5SCC/DMA card is on my
TODO list.
-Klaus
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 07:44:28AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Are there any PCI SCC cards?
Yes. Commercial ones. I think there is a link from the Zilog
website. A few companies (those that also offer VMEbus variants)
seem to be delivering programming info, too. But the price
-Klaus
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 09:30:19AM +0200, Lars Petterson wrote:
> Could you please explain what the PI2 and PackeTwin cards do wrong.
> I have thought about buying a, or manufacture my own, PI2 card so
> it could be nice to know what they lack.
In a DMA write cycle, the SCC wants the data to be v
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 05:21:43PM +0100, Jason Flynn wrote:
> 1) What IC would be a good move 85C230 or 16C3x or
> something different again ?
I would NOT make an ISA design. There are already too many
of them (although I yet have to find a really good one).
If I had the time, I'd go for PCI an
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 08:44:59AM -0700, John Feist wrote:
> Now for the dmascc_cfg challenge. I downloaded the
> dmascc_cfg-0_7_tar.gz file and expanded them in the /utils/dmascc dir. I
> did the 'make dmascc-cfg' and received the response "dmascc_cfg up
> todate". Then ran 'make install' I rec
Jonathan NAYLOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW can someone point me at where to get the (complete) two-line elements
> on the net ?
http://celestrak.com/pub/elements/
-Klaus
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> smdiag is not included. The notes in
> the package say:
>
> Some hdlcutil binaries are not in this package because they require
> the xforms library.
smdiag can be compiled without the XForms library. It just needs the X11
libraries. The hdlcutils that re
> Depends what you had in mind ;-)
>
> I don't mind working on the scripts and modifying it to work in a multiuser
> installation -- I think the original sources work well installed into
> $HOME, but not well as part of the full system. I already did some work
> on that in the Debian package so f
> "...modified versions may NOT be distributed without prior consent..."
Ooops. I didn't realize that part of the license. Indeed, maintaining
is impossible without clarifying that point.
> I have asked Mr. Bester
> for permission to incorporate his software into our distro but he did not
> gran
> I should be able to do some work on the sattrack package this weekend.
Since Bester doesn't seem to maintain SatTrack 3 anymore (I found *no*
reference on the SatTrack homepage), I think we need a maintainer - not
just of the Debian package, but of the "original" tarball.
Are you going to volu
Tomi Manninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK in 2.2.x PI2 card is supported by the dmascc driver which needs its
> own configuration utility (see the Configure.help file for an URL). So the
> proper fix would be to remove the PI2 configure utilility from ax25 utils.
> However I'm not 100% sure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Klaus. I just can't believe that the 8530 based cards do
> not seem to work properly with the PC buss on 386 and above. Especially
They usually _do_ work with 386 and 486 systems. They don't work with some
Pentium systems (and in that case, only DM
Well, Zilog offers a Z16C30 evaluation board for a quite reasonable price
(don't know the US price, maybe $150). From the docs I see that it needs some
minor hardware tweaking in order to interface with reasonable modems. On the
software side, a new driver has to be written. I might do this when I
"Karl F. Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> user.c:127: `AF_AX25' undeclared (first use this function)
include sys/socket.h instead of linux/socket.h.
-Klaus
"Karl F. Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In file included from cache_ctl.c:25:
> /usr/include/linux/ax25.h:46: parse error before `sa_family_t'
Get the ax25rtd patch from http://www.nt.tuwien.ac.at/~kkudielk/Linux/
-Klaus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ax25rtd: SIOCAX250PTRT: Invalid Argument
You might want to try this patch (sorry, completely untested).
Please tell me whether it works.
--- listener.c.ORIG Mon Feb 8 09:49:46 1999
+++ listener.c Mon Feb 8 09:50:18 1999
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@
ax25_opt.port
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, linux is not yet ready for such speeds, you can't have efficient
> communications at 1M2288bps with present parameter timings. I hope something
> will be done about this? I'm talking about at least milisecond resolution, even
> present speeds here at the gat
24 matches
Mail list logo
