Re: IPIP encap routes with 2.2 kernel

2000-03-29 Thread Steve Meuse
inux Hams archive is not working. Here is some mail from Hessu that explains the situation: On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Steve Meuse wrote: > Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a > 2.2.x kernel? Yup. It's different than before. You need the new /sbin/

Re: Convers feed request.

2000-01-28 Thread Steve Meuse
At 01:02 AM 01/28/2000 +0100, Stazione Radio Uni-An wrote: >Hi all, > >hope not to be terribly off-topic asking you if there is aanyone who can >provide us a stable internet connection to a server joining the world wide >chat. > >We are running conversd and we are looking for some "feeding"... >

Re: (slightly) Off topic: IPIP encap and 2.2 kernels

1999-07-08 Thread Steve Meuse
At 07:51 PM 07/08/1999 +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote: >On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Steve Meuse wrote: > >> Has anyone modified the munge script yet, or should I dust off my perl book? > > Here you go. It's on [http|ftp]://[http|ftp].hes.iki.fi/pub/oh7lzb/linux/ >too. > &

Re: (slightly) Off topic: IPIP encap and 2.2 kernels

1999-07-08 Thread Steve Meuse
At 11:18 AM 07/08/1999 +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote: >On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Steve Meuse wrote: > >> Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a >> 2.2.x kernel? > > Yup. It's different than before. You need the new /sbin/ip tool to >

(slightly) Off topic: IPIP encap and 2.2 kernels

1999-07-07 Thread Steve Meuse
Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a 2.2.x kernel? Whenever I try to add an encap route (for lack of a better term) I get the following: # uname -a Linux davros 2.2.9 #5 Sun Jul 4 23:18:48 EDT 1999 i686 unknown # route add -net 44.104.0.0 gw 146.115.236.252

Re: RIP2 for Linux

1999-05-05 Thread Steve Meuse
> >My experience with hamradio networks says that a very good way to do ip >networking in packet radio will be using 2 levels of routing protocols: >1) "Intranetwork". Doing that a subnetwork is "coherent", and has internal >connectivity (a set of point to point routes to the hosts in your subnet)

Re: RIP2 for Linux

1999-05-04 Thread Steve Meuse
At 04:30 PM 05/04/1999 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hi Steve, > >Yes, I have tried GATED, however that is not without its problems. The period >between broadcasts is too short in GATED, and causes problems with others on >the network. It will not work with my local network since the RIP u

Re: RIP2 for Linux

1999-05-04 Thread Steve Meuse
Try Gated. -Steve At 11:03 AM 05/04/1999 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Is RIP2 available for Linux? I see that what I have installed now runs RIP >version 1, which is not compatible with the local network. Anyone have any >ideas here? The inclusion of the newer RIP2 in Linux would be gre

Re: APRS for Linux?

1999-03-30 Thread Steve Meuse
> >Or, perhaps we should think of it as a poorly-designed multicast >system. > >APRS over the MBONE anyone? > >-tjs I'm willing to bet there are only a few of us that have Mbone tunnels to our houses. -Steve

Re: APRS for Linux?

1999-03-29 Thread Steve Meuse
I'm glad to see that this list is subscirbed to by soo many open minded people. At 03:20 PM 03/29/1999 -0800, James S. Kaplan wrote: > >APRS atands for: Actually, Jan, it stands for Automatic Position Reporting System >We Want Our Own 2m Channel, damn any other mode > >We Don't Want to U

Re: VC vs. DG modes

1999-03-22 Thread Steve Meuse
> >ECN tries to provide TCP better feedback about congestion than merely >dropping packets, (or source quench). (You should probably look at the >random early detection (RED) stuff as well.) I've allways thought that RED and AX.25 would work well together. However, I think the "I would have drop

Re: VC vs. DG modes

1999-03-22 Thread Steve Meuse
>Now, as for Linux specifically, one element of ICMP that very few >protocol stacks I have directly studied (and Iplease note I have yet >to delve into Linux kernel code -- I'm sure many here have) pay >any attention to is ICMP source quench messages. Perhaps by making >use of this feature we can

Re: [Fwd: KCT board registers adress]

1999-02-04 Thread Steve Meuse
At 12:14 AM 02/05/1999 +, Bernard Pidoux F6BVP wrote: >Hi, > >There are still too few satellite tracking software and utilities >available for Linux system. To my knowledge, no Linux software can drive >azimut elevation rotors and pilot a transceiver (frequencies and modes). >Developping s

Re: Location of conversd?

1999-02-01 Thread Steve Meuse
The server itself is independant of the ax25utils package. It is a just a tcp daemon just like any other. I suggest using Htpp (Hessu's tpp) which can be located at: ftp.hes.iki.fi in the /pub/oh7lzb/convers directory. The two tar files that you will need are: tpp-convers-1.14.tar.gz and ht

Re: Is this a virus???

1999-01-28 Thread Steve Meuse
At 11:56 AM 01/28/1999 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > Yes, you are infected! Never run binaries received in E-Mail! >Even from people you KNOW! Now that's progression for ya! -Steve n1jfu

Re: Convers server running and building on Redhat 5.1

1999-01-18 Thread Steve Meuse
At 07:28 PM 01/17/1999 +, Edson Pereira wrote: > > >Hi Gerhard, > >Get Hessu's htpp latest version from > >ftp://ftp.hes.iki.fi/pub/oh7lzb/convers > >It is glibc compliant. > >73, > >-- Edson, PU1JTE, N1VTN Thank You Hessu! Finally a glibc/elf convers server!!! No more pp-3.12, yay!!! On a

Re: convers questions

1999-01-05 Thread Steve Meuse
anyone who wants it. >Thanks for any help anyone can provide. We (in the Northeast again) have been doing quite a bit of work recently, so it's fresh in our minds. Let me know if you need any help.. -Steve Meuse N1JFU