On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 08:24:33AM -0700, Bob Meyer wrote:
> Did I screw something up? It's perl script... that is the source code. It compiles
> at run time.
No, I did :) I didn't realise it was perl.
We'd better get it listed in the radio software data base ...
> Ya know, I'm just a dumb t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Might have been good of you to mention it. There is a sizable
> constituent of Linux gateway operators out there that didn't know about
> it.
>
I did mention it on nos-bbs and the old gateways list. At the time no one was
interested. My first dynamic gate was on
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
On 9 Aug, Bob Meyer wrote:
> Humm, I've had one of those for a while. ;-) I just finished playing with the
> new version that has install, uninstall scr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bob,
> Where is the source code?
>
Did I screw something up? It's perl script... that is the source code. It compiles
at run time.
Ya know, I'm just a dumb truck driver playing with this stuff.
Bob
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
On 9 Aug, Bob Meyer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Humm, I've had one of those for a while. ;-) I just finished playing with the
> new version that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
> As a result of some discussion on the convers network about the plight
> of people wanting to operate IPIP encapsulating gateways, but having
> only a dynamic assigned IP network connection, and of hearing that the
> DOS based MFNOS had provided a solution
Hello all,
As a result of some discussion on the convers network about the plight
of people wanting to operate IPIP encapsulating gateways, but having
only a dynamic assigned IP network connection, and of hearing that the
DOS based MFNOS had provided a solution to this problem, I've implemented
a
Hi Terry.
I see from your second message that you accidentally posted this to
the wrong mailing list, but it hasn't appeared in linux-hams yet, so
I've responded to the one that has appeared and forwarded my reply to
both lists. Future comments only expected in linux-hams though...
> As a resul
