Gerd wrote:
> And is there a chance that their respective drivers will support that feature
> :) ?
Depends if someone's doing it 8-)) I've got alpha code, but I currently
lack the time to polish it...
Tom
Hello Thomas, hello all,
> > According to Thomas Sailer, there is a problem of those drivers not being
> > capable of switching from playback to record/sample mode fast enough.
>
> This is no longer a problem, because (almost?) all new cards are full duplex
> capable anyway 8-)
And is there a c
Gerd wrote:
> According to Thomas Sailer, there is a problem of those drivers not being
> capable of switching from playback to record/sample mode fast enough.
This is no longer a problem, because (almost?) all new cards are full duplex
capable anyway 8-)
Thomas
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hardware TNC (Baycom etc.)
Hello Gerd
Hello All
>The second reason is that the SoundModem driver must be considered
experimental, and
>is sometimes not easy to set up. Even more, it seems that Thomas's support
for that
>driver has slightly vanished. He do
Hello Gerd
Hello All
>The second reason is that the SoundModem driver must be considered
experimental, and
>is sometimes not easy to set up. Even more, it seems that Thomas's support
for that
>driver has slightly vanished. He does not want to enhance tools like smdiag
or
>smmixer any more and e
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Gerd wrote:
> > standard sound drivers (either OSS or ALSA).
>
> According to Thomas Sailer, there is a problem of those drivers not being
> capable of switching from playback to record/sample mode fast enough.
> It may also be not very easy to get FSK RX/TX filters as well
Hello Hamish, hello all,
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 03:53:58PM +0100, Gerd wrote:
> > There are some good reasons to still use something like BayCom in our days.
> > The first reason is: There are still frequencies that one cannot operate
> > more than 1200 bps on, due to bandwidth limitations, fo
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 03:53:58PM +0100, Gerd wrote:
> There are some good reasons to still use something like BayCom in our days.
> The first reason is: There are still frequencies that one cannot operate more than
> 1200 bps on, due to bandwidth limitations, for example.
soundmodem supports 1
Hello Frank, hello all,
> I do not understand the interest in special hardware type
> modems like the Baycom. Although I have used the Baycom
> (with the TI chip) and the Poor Man's Packet modem (using
> the Am7910), I have found it much more convenient, and less
> expensive (time and material)
Try running 3 or 4 soundcard ports on one machine for a node or something -
then you will see the attraction...
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> I do not understand the interest in special hardware type
> modems like the Baycom. Although I have used the Baycom
> (with the TI chip) and the Poo
10 matches
Mail list logo
