Tomi Manninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, there are two issues here. First: you say software has to be
> broken. Well, in my opinion the notion that a piece of software needs to
> know what happens underneath it (with 300ms granularity) is _completely_
> broken. Unless of course if the
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jan Wasserbauer wrote:
> Jan Wasserbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IMHO TNT is broken in this case. Why does it need to read it so often?
> > TNT periodically reads channel status. I am trying to get it working using
> > ioctl but can't find any way how to get number o
Jan please re-organize your thoughts and send first your
improvements to the ax25 software and then talk in another message about
what's wrong with TNT. To my knowlege TNT is designed to work without the
ax25-utils so that may be your problem...:-)
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jan Wasserbauer wr
Jan Wasserbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMHO TNT is broken in this case. Why does it need to read it so often?
> TNT periodically reads channel status. I am trying to get it working using
> ioctl but can't find any way how to get number of unacked frames. Normally TNT
> counts unacked frame
