Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] overflow: Introduce wrapping_add(), wrapping_sub(), and wrapping_mul()

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:24, Kees Cook wrote: > > Provide helpers that will perform wrapping addition, subtraction, or > multiplication without tripping the arithmetic wrap-around sanitizers. The > first argument is the type under which the wrap-around should happen > with. In other words, these t

[PATCH v5 2/3] overflow: Introduce wrapping_add(), wrapping_sub(), and wrapping_mul()

Provide helpers that will perform wrapping addition, subtraction, or multiplication without tripping the arithmetic wrap-around sanitizers. The first argument is the type under which the wrap-around should happen with. In other words, these two calls will get very different results: wrappi