On Mon, 6 May 2024 12:38:32 +0200
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The logic in arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c is now only used by non-EFI
> boot.
>
> In general, I am highly skeptical that hopes and prayers are enough to
> prevent the firmware from stepping on such a region, unless this is
> only a
On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 16:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:22:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:59:07 +0300
> > > Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:41:24PM
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:22:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:59:07 +0300
> > Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:11:5
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:59:07 +0300
> Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:11:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:23:07
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:59:07 +0300
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:11:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:23:07 -0700
> > > Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do we need to involve e820 at
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:41:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:11:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:23:07 -0700
> > Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > Do we need to involve e820 at all? I think it might be possible to just
> > > have pstore call request_
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:11:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:23:07 -0700
> Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > Do we need to involve e820 at all? I think it might be possible to just
> > have pstore call request_mem_region() very early? Or does KASLR make
> > that unstable?
>
> Yea
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:23:07 -0700
Kees Cook wrote:
> Do we need to involve e820 at all? I think it might be possible to just
> have pstore call request_mem_region() very early? Or does KASLR make
> that unstable?
Yeah, would that give the same physical memory each boot, and can we
guarantee that
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:02:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> In order to allow for requesting a memory region that can be used for
> things like pstore on multiple machines where the memory is not the same,
> add a new option to the memmap=nn$ kernel comma
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
In order to allow for requesting a memory region that can be used for
things like pstore on multiple machines where the memory is not the same,
add a new option to the memmap=nn$ kernel command line.
The memmap=nn$addr will reserve nn amount of memory at the physi
10 matches
Mail list logo
