Hi!
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:29:47PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> As the driver doesn't treat the two devices differently, the enum isn't
> really needed. I don't really mind though, just a notice.
Yeah, I just thought it looked cleaner this way. I thought also about
adding an enum chips entry
Hi Alvaro,
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:43:11 +0100, Alvaro Gamez Machado wrote:
> Since autodetection of this chip was removed, it makes sense to add prefix
> max6635 so that the device can be instantiated by its actual name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvaro Gamez Machado
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/lm92.c | 5 +
Since autodetection of this chip was removed, it makes sense to add prefix
max6635 so that the device can be instantiated by its actual name.
Signed-off-by: Alvaro Gamez Machado
---
drivers/hwmon/lm92.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c
