linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Shradha Gupta ;
sta...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc:Register VF in netvsc_probe if
NET_DEVICE_REGISTER missed
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:09:57 -0800 Shradha Gupta wrote:
> This patch ap
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:09:57 -0800 Shradha Gupta wrote:
> This patch applies to net, which is missed in the subject. I will fix
> this in the new version of the patch. Thanks
$ git checkout net/main
[...]
$ git am raw
Applying: hv_netvsc:Register VF in netvsc_probe if NET_DEVICE_REGISTER missed
t; hyp...@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Shradha Gupta ;
> sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] hv_netvsc:Register VF in netvsc_probe if
> NET_DEVICE_REGISTER missed
>
> > From: Haiyang Zhang
> > Sent: Wednesday, Janu
> From: Haiyang Zhang
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 8:46 AM
> [...]
> > From: Shradha Gupta
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 2:54 AM
> > > [...]
> > > > + netvsc_prepare_bonding(vf_netdev);
> > > > + netvsc_register_vf(vf_netdev, VF_REG_IN_PROBE);
> > > > +
perv@vger.kernel.org;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Shradha Gupta
> ; sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc:Register VF in netvsc_probe if
> NET_DEVICE_REGISTER missed
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:13:21PM +, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > &g
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:13:21PM +, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > From: Shradha Gupta
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:19 PM
> > [...]
> > If hv_netvsc driver is removed and reloaded, the NET_DEVICE_REGISTER
>
> s/removed/unloaded/
> unloaded looks more accurate to me :-)
>
> > [...]
> > Tes
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:29:14PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:18:55 -0800 Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > If hv_netvsc driver is removed and reloaded, the NET_DEVICE_REGISTER
> > handler cannot perform VF register successfully as the register call
> > is received before netvsc_p
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:18:55 -0800 Shradha Gupta wrote:
> If hv_netvsc driver is removed and reloaded, the NET_DEVICE_REGISTER
> handler cannot perform VF register successfully as the register call
> is received before netvsc_probe is finished. This is because we
> register register_netdevice_notif
> From: Haiyang Zhang
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 2:05 PM
> [...]
> > > @@ -2205,8 +2209,11 @@ static int netvsc_vf_join(struct net_device
> > > *vf_netdev,
> > > ndev->name, ret);
> > > goto upper_link_failed;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > - schedule_delayed_work(&n
> -Original Message-
> From: Dexuan Cui
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 3:13 PM
> To: Shradha Gupta ; KY Srinivasan
>
> > @@ -2205,8 +2209,11 @@ static int netvsc_vf_join(struct net_device
> > *vf_netdev,
> >ndev->name, ret);
> > goto upper_link_
> From: Shradha Gupta
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:19 PM
> [...]
> If hv_netvsc driver is removed and reloaded, the NET_DEVICE_REGISTER
s/removed/unloaded/
unloaded looks more accurate to me :-)
> [...]
> Tested-on: Ubuntu22
> Testcases: LISA testsuites
> verify_reload_hyperv_mo
> -Original Message-
> From: Shradha Gupta
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 2:19 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; Wei Liu ; Dexuan Cui
> ; David S. Miller ; Eric
> Dumazet ; Jakub Kicinski ; Paolo
> Abeni ; Wojciech Drewek ;
> linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.
12 matches
Mail list logo
