November 21, 2023 at 10:51 PM, "Wei Liu" wrote:
> Uros, just so you know, DKIM verification failed when I used b4 to apply
> this patch. You may want to check your email setup.
This is not actually Uros's fault. Recently, Gmail started adding a forced
expiration field to their DKIM signatures,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:31 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 4:52 AM Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:58:29PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:19 PM Michael Kelley
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Tuesday,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 4:52 AM Wei Liu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:58:29PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:19 PM Michael Kelley wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023
> > > 8:59 AM
> > > >
> > > > Use atomic_try_cmpxchg()
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:58:29PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:19 PM Michael Kelley wrote:
> >
> > From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 8:59
> > AM
> > >
> > > Use atomic_try_cmpxchg() instead of atomic_cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old
> > > in
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:19 PM Michael Kelley wrote:
>
> From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 8:59 AM
> >
> > Use atomic_try_cmpxchg() instead of atomic_cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old
> > in hv_nmi_unknown(). On x86 the CMPXCHG instruction returns success in
> > the ZF flag, so
From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 8:59 AM
>
> Use atomic_try_cmpxchg() instead of atomic_cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old
> in hv_nmi_unknown(). On x86 the CMPXCHG instruction returns success in
> the ZF flag, so this change saves a compare after CMPXCHG. The generated
> asm code
