On 2023-10-27 12:40, Justin Stitt wrote:
Yeah you can push it but it's not really a standalone so perhaps I'll
just steal the diff and
wrap into v3?
Fine by me.
No need for my sign off.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 3:39 PM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 21:56 +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
> > ethtool_puts() would suffice.
> []
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -7011,6
On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 21:56 +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
> ethtool_puts() would suffice.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -7011,6 +7011,25 @@ sub process {
>"Prefer
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 03:24:54PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> There was some discussion here [1] but AFAICT I need to use EMACS
> or configure my vim in a very particular way to get the same formatting
>
> But yeah, look around line 7000 -- lots of this pattern matching code is
> pretty hard to
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 3:12 PM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:56:08PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
> > ethtool_puts() would suffice.
> >
> > The two cases are:
> >
> > 1) Use ethtool_sprintf() with just two
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:56:08PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
> ethtool_puts() would suffice.
>
> The two cases are:
>
> 1) Use ethtool_sprintf() with just two arguments:
> | ethtool_sprintf(, driver[i].name);
> or
> 2) Use
