Hi, Jean
Thanks for your instruction.
Here is patch to modify some comments of i2c_master_send
i2c_master_recv, is this OK.
Where's the screaming things, dude?
Thanks
Zhangfei
From 30fbf1ebf1facba3d280c887e2ecfd0499e7b04b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhangfei Gao zg...@marvell.com
Hello Sekhar,
My apologies for the late mail. Had trouble with our mail server and I
seem to have lost mails. Pulling this thread from the list. Comments
inline...
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Nori, Sekhar nsek...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Philby,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:11:33, Kevin Hilman
Hello Sekhar,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Nori, Sekhar nsek...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Philby,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 16:47:11, Philby John wrote:
From cb3347e45449ff16a332aa164eae24ef6a2432e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philby John pj...@in.mvista.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:53:31
Hi Linus,
Please pull one i2c subsystem fix for Linux 2.6.33 from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jdelvare/staging.git i2c-for-linus
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tiny-usb.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
Jean Delvare (1):
The description of the delay parameter is incomplete, it suggests that
there is a direct relation between the delay value and the bus
frequency. In fact, due to additional delays in the i2c bitbanging
code, the i2c clock is always much slower.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc:
On Friday 05 February 2010, you wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:57:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
Allow I2C drivers to make use of the runtime PM framework by adding
bus implementations of the runtime PM operations. These simply
