On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:02:26PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Would it make sense to add generic I2C device tree properties for those
parameters? These parameters are independent of the actual bus driver,
rather a PCB property... And as such the correct place would be device
tree or
Every driver would thus have to implement its own defaults in case the
properties are not defined.
Placing the defaults at driver level sounds fine to me.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-i2c in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
[Adding other devicetree maintainers to Cc]
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
发件人: Mark Rutland [mark.rutl...@arm.com]
发送时间: 2013年8月10日 22:08
收件人: Lu Jingchang-B35083
抄送: w...@the-dreams.de; Estevam Fabio-R49496;
On Monday 12 of August 2013 17:43:54 Mark Rutland wrote:
[Adding other devicetree maintainers to Cc]
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
发件人: Mark Rutland [mark.rutl...@arm.com]
发送时间: 2013年8月10日 22:08
收件人: Lu
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 17:43:54 Mark Rutland wrote:
[Adding other devicetree maintainers to Cc]
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
发件人: Mark Rutland
On 08/12/2013 10:43 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
[Adding other devicetree maintainers to Cc]
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
发件人: Mark Rutland [mark.rutl...@arm.com]
发送时间: 2013年8月10日 22:08
收件人: Lu Jingchang-B35083
