Hi,
On 10.10.2013 12:34, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
Hi!
On 10/10/2013 10:39 AM, Ionut Nicu wrote:
The i2c-mux driver uses the chan_id parameter provided
in i2c_add_mux_adapter as a parameter to the select
and deselect callbacks while the i2c-mux-gpio driver
uses the chan_id as an index in
Some gpio chips may have get/set operations that
can sleep. gpio_set_value() only works for chips
which do not sleep, for the others we will get a
kernel warning. Using gpio_set_value_cansleep()
will work for both chips that do sleep and those
who don't.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
The i2c-mux driver requires that the chan_id parameter
passed to the i2c_add_mux_adapter() function is equal
to the reg value for that adapter:
for_each_child_of_node(mux_dev-of_node, child) {
ret = of_property_read_u32(child, reg, reg);
if (ret)
continue;
IN == Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com writes:
IN Some gpio chips may have get/set operations that
IN can sleep. gpio_set_value() only works for chips
IN which do not sleep, for the others we will get a
IN kernel warning. Using gpio_set_value_cansleep()
IN will work for both chips that do sleep
The exynos5 i2c clock is based on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and
therefore is completely independent of the cpu frequency.
Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful.
This patch modifes the code such that, i2c bus registers to
cpu_freq_transition only for non Exynos SoCs.
Some gpio chips may have get/set operations that
can sleep. gpio_set_value() only works for chips
which do not sleep, for the others we will get a
kernel warning. Using gpio_set_value_cansleep()
will work for both chips that do sleep and those
who don't.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
On Friday, October 11, 2013 05:49:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
+Rafael
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:17:49PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
There is a minor fault about ACPI enumerated I2C devices with their modalias
attribute. Now modalias is set by device instance not by hardware ID.
For
Hi Naveen,
On Friday 11 of October 2013 16:56:54 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
The exynos5 i2c clock is based on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and
therefore is completely independent of the cpu frequency.
Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful.
This patch modifes
[Fixing incorrent mail addresses and dropping the old DT ML.]
On Saturday 12 of October 2013 04:22:04 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Naveen,
On Friday 11 of October 2013 16:56:54 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
The exynos5 i2c clock is based on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and
therefore is
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:16:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think that this is intentional. We don't want that the i2c modalias
matches with the ACPI device (like with the i2c:INTABCD). Instead use ACPI
IDs that are added to the driver to match with the ACPI device.
Well, I'm not
On Saturday 12 of October 2013 04:28:51 Tomasz Figa wrote:
[Fixing incorrent mail addresses and dropping the old DT ML.]
On Saturday 12 of October 2013 04:22:04 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Naveen,
On Friday 11 of October 2013 16:56:54 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
The exynos5 i2c clock
11 matches
Mail list logo
