Re: [PATCH 06/12] i2c: sh_mobile: Convert to clk_prepare/unprepare

2013-10-31 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:49:23PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Turn clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls into clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() to get ready for the migration to the common clock framework. Cc: Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH v2 03/19] i2c: sh_mobile: Enable the driver on all ARM platforms

2013-10-31 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37:38PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Renesas ARM platforms are transitioning from single-platform to multi-platform kernels using the new ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI. Make the driver available on all ARM platforms to enable it on both ARCH_SHMOBILE and ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI,

Re: [patch] i2c-scmi: remove some bogus NULL checks

2013-10-31 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:46:22AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: obj can't be NULL here. We already know that pkg-package.elements gives us a valid pointer so the next pointer after that is also non-NULL. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com Applied to for-next, thanks!

Re: [PATCH] i2c: rcar: fixup rcar type naming

2013-10-31 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:36:52PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: b720423a2627f045133bec39a31fe2bc0dab86f3 (i2c: rcar: add rcar-H2 support) added R-Car H2 support on i2c-rcar. But the added i2c type naming was H1/H2, instead of Gen1/Gen2 (Generation 1/2) Gen1/Gen2 is better naming on this

Re: [RFC 1/2] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

2013-10-31 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 28, 2013 03:15:25 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote: Hi Rafael On 10/25/2013 05:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, October 25, 2013 04:30:23 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote: Hmm, not only. Referencing to dev field in struct acpi_device by dev_name(adev-dev) here will fail

Re: [RFC 1/2] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

2013-10-31 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, November 01, 2013 01:08:47 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, October 28, 2013 03:15:25 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote: Hi Rafael On 10/25/2013 05:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, October 25, 2013 04:30:23 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote: Hmm, not only. Referencing to