Re: [PATCH 3/6] i2c: rcar: do not print error if device nacks transfer

2014-05-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
> >-if (ret < 0) > >+if (ret < 0 && ret != -EREMOTEIO) > > dev_err(dev, "error %d : %x\n", ret, priv->flags); > >Hm, I'm now getting -EBUSY and -EAGAIN running i2cdetect on > R8A7791 base Henninger board. Only when I comment out the above 2 > lines, I can get the bus scann

Re: [PATCH 3/6] i2c: rcar: do not print error if device nacks transfer

2014-05-08 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 01/26/2014 07:05 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: The i2c-rcar driver currently prints an error message if the master_xfer callback fails. However if the bus is being probed then lots of NAKs will be generated, causing the output of a number of errors printed. To solve this, disable the print

Re: [PATCH 00/22] Random ARM randconfig fixes in drivers

2014-05-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:46:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > These are a bunch of fixes I had to do to get all randconfig > configurations on ARM working. Most of these are really old > bugs, but there are also some new ones. I don't think any of > them require a backport to linux-stable. > >

[PATCH] i2c/nuc900: fix ancient build error

2014-05-08 Thread Arnd Bergmann
As far as I can tell, this driver must have produced this error for as long as it has been merged into the mainline kernel, but it was never part of the normal build tests: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c: In function 'nuc900_i2c_probe': drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nuc900.c:601:17: error: request for m

[PATCH 00/22] Random ARM randconfig fixes in drivers

2014-05-08 Thread Arnd Bergmann
These are a bunch of fixes I had to do to get all randconfig configurations on ARM working. Most of these are really old bugs, but there are also some new ones. I don't think any of them require a backport to linux-stable. I have checked that they are all still required on yesterday's linux-next k