> I know you've already applied my series to your for-next tree, but let me
> know if you want me to squash this patch into the P2WI series and send a v8.
I can't rebase my for-next.
Had it already fixed locally, just forgot to send out due to NMI.
Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
Hey Bill,
I see that you are the author of the i2c-ismt driver so thought will check with
you on a issue that I have been seeing on my setup.
My setup has an Intel Atom S1220 Processor which has a PMBUS device on its
SMBUS 2.0 controller (SMBus—Bus 0:D19:F0-1).
Now while accessing(read/write)
Hey Bill,
I see that you are the author of the i2c-ismt driver so thought will check with
you on a issue that I have been seeing on my setup.
My setup has an Intel Atom S1220 Processor which has a PMBUS device on its
SMBUS 2.0 controller (SMBus—Bus 0:D19:F0-1).
Now while accessing(read/write)
Am 12.06.2014 09:55, schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 03.06.2014 13:18, schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 02.06.2014 14:16, schrieb Linus Walleij:
Is this really so useful on embedded systems?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Am 03.06.2014 13:18, schrieb Linus Walleij:
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 02.06.2014 14:16, schrieb Linus Walleij:
>>
>>
Is this really so useful on embedded systems?
I was under the imp
The variable containing the return value of platform_get_irq is irq not
ret, this means the error code printed in the error message will be false.
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu
---
Hello Wolfram,
This patch fixes a bug reported by Fengguang's build robot.
I know you
